Literature DB >> 18345837

Two-tone suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Douglas H Keefe1, John C Ellison, Denis F Fitzpatrick, Michael P Gorga.   

Abstract

Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) measured using a suppressor tone in human ears are analogous to two-tone suppression responses measured mechanically and neurally in mammalian cochleae. SFOAE suppression was measured in 24 normal-hearing adults at octave frequencies (f(p)=0.5-8.0 kHz) over a 40 dB range of probe levels (L(p)). Suppressor frequencies (f(s)) ranged from -2.0 to 0.7 octaves re: f(p), and suppressor levels ranged from just detectable suppression to full suppression. The lowest suppression thresholds occurred for "best" f(s) slightly higher than f(p). SFOAE growth of suppression (GOS) had slopes close to one at frequencies much lower than best f(s), and shallow slopes near best f(s), which indicated compressive growth close to 0.3 dBdB. Suppression tuning curves constructed from GOS functions were well defined at 1, 2, and 4 kHz, but less so at 0.5 and 8.0 kHz. Tuning was sharper at lower L(p) with an equivalent rectangular bandwidth similar to that reported behaviorally for simultaneous masking. The tip-to-tail difference assessed cochlear gain, increasing with decreasing L(p) and increasing f(p) at the lowest L(p) from 32 to 45 dB for f(p) from 1 to 4 kHz. SFOAE suppression provides a noninvasive measure of the saturating nonlinearities associated with cochlear amplification on the basilar membrane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18345837      PMCID: PMC2517244          DOI: 10.1121/1.2828209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  52 in total

1.  Simultaneous recording of stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emission input-output functions in human ears.

Authors:  Kim S Schairer; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Transient-evoked stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cochlear compression wave: an implication of the Allen-Fahey experiment.

Authors:  Tianying Ren; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Time-course of the human medial olivocochlear reflex.

Authors:  Bradford C Backus; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission latency and level to investigate cochlear mechanics in human ears.

Authors:  Kim S Schairer; John C Ellison; Denis Fitzpatrick; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The evoked cochlear mechanical response and the auditory microstructure - evidence for a new element in cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl       Date:  1979

7.  Interrelation of different oto-acoustic emissions.

Authors:  E Zwicker; E Schloth
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  An active cochlear model showing sharp tuning and high sensitivity.

Authors:  S T Neely; D O Kim
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  An active process in cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  H Davis
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Single-neuron labeling in the cat auditory nerve.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-06-11       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  27 in total

1.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on otoacoustic and neural measures suggest that stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions originate near the peak region of the traveling wave.

Authors:  Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-15

2.  Influence of stimulus parameters on amplitude-modulated stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Laura Beshaler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

4.  High frequency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission measurements using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Chelsea M Blankenship; Angela C Garinis; Daniel B Putterman; Marcin Wróblewski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Low-frequency and high-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Judy Kopun; Kristin Jolkowski; Kristin Groenenboom; Hongyang Tan; Bettina Stiegemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Specification of absorbed-sound power in the ear canal: application to suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Kim S Schairer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in human newborns.

Authors:  Radha Kalluri; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Comparisons of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.

Authors:  Uzma Shaheen Wilson; Jenna Browning-Kamins; Sriram Boothalingam; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.