Literature DB >> 16018483

Transient-evoked stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired ears.

Dawn Konrad-Martin1, Douglas H Keefe.   

Abstract

Transient-evoked stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs), recorded using a nonlinear differential technique, and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were measured in 17 normal-hearing and 10 hearing-impaired subjects using pairs of tone pips (pp), gated tones (gg), and for DPOAEs, continuous and gated tones (cg). Temporal envelopes of stimulus and OAE waveforms were obtained by narrow-band filtering at the stimulus or DP frequency. Mean SFOAE latencies in normal ears at 2.7 and 4.0 kHz decreased with increasing stimulus level and were larger at 4.0 kHz than latencies in impaired ears. Equivalent auditory filter bandwidths were calculated as a function of stimulus level from SFOAE latencies by assuming that cochlear transmission is minimum phase. DPOAE latencies varied less with level than SFOAE latencies. The ppDPOAEs often had two (or more) peaks separated in time with latencies consistent with model predictions for distortion and reflection components. Changes in ppDPOAE latency with level were sometimes explained by a shift in relative amplitudes of distortion and reflection components. The pp SFOAE SPL within the main spectral lobe of the pip stimulus was higher for normal ears in the higher-frequency half of the pip than the lower-frequency half, which is likely an effect of basilar membrane two-tone suppression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16018483     DOI: 10.1121/1.1904403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on otoacoustic and neural measures suggest that stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions originate near the peak region of the traveling wave.

Authors:  Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-15

2.  Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission latency and level to investigate cochlear mechanics in human ears.

Authors:  Kim S Schairer; John C Ellison; Denis Fitzpatrick; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions to investigate efferent and cochlear contributions to temporal overshoot.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Kim S Schairer; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Influence of stimulus parameters on amplitude-modulated stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Laura Beshaler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Level dependence of distortion product otoacoustic emission phase is attributed to component mixing.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of Forward- and Emitted-Pressure Calibrations on the Variability of Otoacoustic Emission Measurements Across Repeated Probe Fits.

Authors:  Tom Maxim; Christopher A Shera; Karolina K Charaziak; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The breaking of cochlear scaling symmetry in human newborns and adults.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar; Srikanta Mishra
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The effect of stimulus bandwidth on the nonlinear-derived tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Shawn S Goodman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-23

9.  Swept-tone stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions: Normative data and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Yeini C Guardia; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Two-tone suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.