Literature DB >> 16938978

Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission latency and level to investigate cochlear mechanics in human ears.

Kim S Schairer1, John C Ellison, Denis Fitzpatrick, Douglas H Keefe.   

Abstract

Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission (SFOAE) sound pressure level (SPL) and latency were measured at probe frequencies from 500 to 4000 Hz and probe levels from 40 to 70 dB SPL in 16 normal-hearing adult ears. The main goal was to use SFOAE latency estimates to better understand possible source mechanisms such as linear coherent reflection, nonlinear distortion, and reverse transmission via the cochlear fluid, and how those sources might change as a function of stimulus level. Another goal was to use SFOAE latencies to noninvasively estimate cochlear tuning. SFOAEs were dominated by the reflection source at low stimulus levels, consistent with previous research, but neither nonlinear distortion nor fluid compression become the dominant source even at the highest stimulus level. At each stimulus level, the SFOAE latency was an approximately constant number of periods from 1000 to 4000 Hz, consistent with cochlear scaling symmetry. SFOAE latency decreased with increasing stimulus level in an approximately frequency-independent manner. Tuning estimates were constant above 1000 Hz, consistent with simultaneous masking data, but in contrast to previous estimates from SFOAEs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16938978      PMCID: PMC1661834          DOI: 10.1121/1.2214147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  33 in total

1.  Basilar membrane vibration in the basal turn of the sensitive gerbil cochlea.

Authors:  T Ren; A L Nuttall
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Indications of different distortion product otoacoustic emission mechanisms from a detailed f1,f2 area study.

Authors:  R D Knight; D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Modeling the combined effects of basilar membrane nonlinearity and roughness on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission fine structure.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; A Tubis; G R Long; C Tong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  On the relationships between the fixed-f1, fixed-f2, and fixed-ratio phase derivatives of the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  A Tubis; C L Talmadge; C Tong; S Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Simultaneous recording of stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emission input-output functions in human ears.

Authors:  Kim S Schairer; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Transient-evoked stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Coherent reflection in a two-dimensional cochlea: Short-wave versus long-wave scattering in the generation of reflection-source otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Arnold Tubis; Carrick L Talmadge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Fine structure of the 2 f1-f2 acoustic distortion products: effects of primary level and frequency ratios.

Authors:  N He; R A Schmiedt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; N C Rich; A Recio; S S Narayan; L Robles
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Delayed evoked oto-acoustic emissions and their suppression by Gaussian-shaped pressure impulses.

Authors:  E Zwicker
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  40 in total

1.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on otoacoustic and neural measures suggest that stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions originate near the peak region of the traveling wave.

Authors:  Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-15

2.  Tectorial membrane morphological variation: effects upon stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; David S Velenovsky; Kevin E Bonine
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Coherent reflection without traveling waves: on the origin of long-latency otoacoustic emissions in lizards.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Optimizing swept-tone protocols for recording distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults and newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions to investigate efferent and cochlear contributions to temporal overshoot.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Kim S Schairer; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Measuring stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions using swept tones.

Authors:  Radha Kalluri; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Medial olivocochlear-induced transient-evoked otoacoustic emission amplitude shifts in individual subjects.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Ian B Mertes; James D Lewis; Diana K Weissbeck
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-28

8.  Influence of stimulus parameters on amplitude-modulated stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Laura Beshaler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

10.  Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.

Authors:  Uzma Shaheen Wilson; Jenna Browning-Kamins; Sriram Boothalingam; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.