Literature DB >> 22002610

Effects of low-frequency biasing on otoacoustic and neural measures suggest that stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions originate near the peak region of the traveling wave.

Jeffery T Lichtenhan1.   

Abstract

Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) have been used to study a variety of topics in cochlear mechanics, although a current topic of debate is where in the cochlea these emissions are generated. One hypothesis is that SFOAE generation is predominately near the peak region of the traveling wave. An opposing hypothesis is that SFOAE generation near the peak region is deemphasized compared to generation in the tail region of the traveling wave. A comparison was made between the effect of low-frequency biasing on both SFOAEs and a physiologic measure that arises from the peak region of the traveling wave--the compound action potential (CAP). SFOAE biasing was measured as the amplitude of spectral sidebands from varying bias tone levels. CAP biasing was measured as the suppression of CAP amplitude from varying bias tone levels. Measures of biasing effects were made throughout the cochlea. Results from cats show that the level of bias tone needed for maximum SFOAE sidebands and for 50% CAP reduction increased as probe frequency increased. Results from guinea pigs show an irregular bias effect as a function of probe frequency. In both species, there was a strong and positive relationship between the bias level needed for maximum SFOAE sidebands and for 50% CAP suppression. This relationship is consistent with the hypothesis that the majority of SFOAE is generated near the peak region of the traveling wave.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22002610      PMCID: PMC3254722          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-011-0296-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  43 in total

1.  Influence of hearing sensitivity on mechano-electric transduction.

Authors:  Mark E Chertoff; Xing Yi; Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Objective estimates of cochlear tuning by otoacoustic emission analysis.

Authors:  Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are amplitude-stabilized cochlear standing waves.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Time-frequency analyses of transient-evoked stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: testing cochlear model predictions.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The influence of transducer operating point on distortion generation in the cochlea.

Authors:  Davud B Sirjani; Alec N Salt; Ruth M Gill; Shane A Hale
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Human cochlear tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Thomas Bentsen; James M Harte; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Using the cochlear microphonic as a tool to evaluate cochlear function in mouse models of hearing.

Authors:  Mary Ann Cheatham; Khurram Naik; Peter Dallos
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-10-19

9.  Sensitivity, polarity, and conductance change in the response of vertebrate hair cells to controlled mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  A J Hudspeth; D P Corey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  13 in total

1.  An analysis of cochlear response harmonics: Contribution of neural excitation.

Authors:  M E Chertoff; A M Kamerer; M Peppi; J T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Influence of stimulus parameters on amplitude-modulated stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Laura Beshaler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Cochlear Frequency Tuning and Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Karolina K Charaziak
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.915

4.  Estimating cochlear frequency selectivity with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-18

5.  The Spatial Origins of Cochlear Amplification Assessed by Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Choongheon Lee; John J Guinan; Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Drug delivery into the cochlear apex: Improved control to sequentially affect finely spaced regions along the entire length of the cochlear spiral.

Authors:  J T Lichtenhan; J Hartsock; J R Dornhoffer; K M Donovan; A N Salt
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex inhibition of human cochlear nerve responses.

Authors:  J T Lichtenhan; U S Wilson; K E Hancock; J J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  The auditory nerve overlapped waveform (ANOW) originates in the cochlear apex.

Authors:  J T Lichtenhan; J J Hartsock; R M Gill; J J Guinan; A N Salt
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-11

9.  Multiple indices of the 'bounce' phenomenon obtained from the same human ears.

Authors:  M Drexl; M Uberfuhr; T D Weddell; A N Lukashkin; L Wiegrebe; E Krause; R Gürkov
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-20

10.  Efferent Modulation of Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Fine Structure.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; James B Dewey; Sriram Boothalingam; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.