Literature DB >> 25618103

Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in human newborns.

Radha Kalluri1, Carolina Abdala1.   

Abstract

This study presents the first reported measurements of stimulus frequency emissions (SFOAEs) in 15 human newborns and compares their magnitudes and phase-gradient delays to those reported in adults. SFOAEs in newborns were measured at stimulus levels as low as 15 dB sound pressure level (SPL). Responses were compared between adults and newborns at stimulus levels where SFOAEs in both age groups demonstrated approximately linear growth (<40 dB SPL for newborns, <25 dB SPL for adults). Neonates had adult-like SFOAE delays when compared in this fashion, which compensates for newborn middle ear inefficiencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25618103      PMCID: PMC4272386          DOI: 10.1121/1.4903915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Interrelationships between spontaneous and low-level stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Analydia Fulcher; Susan Richmond; David Velenovsky; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Maturation and aging of the human cochlea: a view through the DPOAE looking glass.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-03

4.  The breaking of cochlear scaling symmetry in human newborns and adults.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar; Srikanta Mishra
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Evoked and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. A comparison of neonates and adults.

Authors:  L Collet; M Gartner; E Veuillet; A Moulin; A Morgon
Journal:  Brain Dev       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.961

6.  Human cochlear tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Thomas Bentsen; James M Harte; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing infants and children: emerging data and issues.

Authors:  S J Norton; J E Widen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

Authors:  M P Gorga; S T Neely; B M Bergman; K L Beauchaine; J R Kaminski; J Peters; L Schulte; W Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  8 in total

1.  Characterizing spontaneous otoacoustic emissions across the human lifespan.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Angela Yarnell Bonino; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.

Authors:  Uzma Shaheen Wilson; Jenna Browning-Kamins; Sriram Boothalingam; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Factors responsible for remote-frequency masking in children and adults.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Objective Assessment System for Hearing Prediction Based on Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Qin Gong; Yin Liu; Runyi Xu; Dong Liang; Zewen Peng; Honghao Yang
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Swept-Tone Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Human Newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Yeini Guardia
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

8.  Characteristic of Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions: Detection Rate, Musical Training Influence, and Gain Function.

Authors:  Yao Wang; Zhihang Qi; Mengmeng Yu; Jinhai Wang; Ruijuan Chen
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-09-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.