Literature DB >> 23927112

Influence of stimulus parameters on amplitude-modulated stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Tiffany A Johnson1, Laura Beshaler.   

Abstract

The present study evaluated the influence of suppressor frequency (fs) and level (Ls) on stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) recorded using the amplitude-modulated (AM) suppressor technique described by Neely et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 2124-2127 (2005a)]. Data were collected in normal-hearing subjects, with data collection occurring in two phases. In phase 1, SFOAEs were recorded with probe frequency (fp) = 1, 2, and 4 kHz and probe levels (Lp) ranging from 0 to 60 dB sound pressure level (SPL). At each fp, Ls ranged from Ls = Lp to Ls = Lp + 30 dB. Additionally, nine relationships between fs and fp were evaluated, ranging from fs/fp = 0.80 to fs/fp = 1.16. Results indicated that for low suppressor levels, suppressors higher in frequency than fp (fs > fp) resulted in higher AM-SFOAE levels than suppressors lower in frequency than fp (fs < fp). At higher suppressor levels, suppressors both higher and lower in frequency than fp produced similar AM-SFOAE levels, and, in many cases, low-frequency suppressors produced the largest response. Recommendations for stimulus parameters that maximize AM-SFOAE level were derived from these data. In phase 2, AM-SFOAEs were recorded using these parameters for fp = 0.7-8 kHz and Lp = 20-60 dB SPL. Robust AM-SFOAE responses were recorded in this group of subjects using the parameters developed in phase 1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23927112      PMCID: PMC3745488          DOI: 10.1121/1.4812766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  34 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Two-tone suppression in the basilar membrane of the cochlea: mechanical basis of auditory-nerve rate suppression.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; L Robles; N C Rich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Interrelationships between spontaneous and low-level stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Analydia Fulcher; Susan Richmond; David Velenovsky; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity.

Authors:  S A Gaskill; A M Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Input-output functions for stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adult ears.

Authors:  Kim S Schairer; Denis Fitzpatrick; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio.

Authors:  F P Harris; B L Lonsbury-Martin; B B Stagner; A C Coats; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Sources of DPOAEs revealed by suppression experiments, inverse fast Fourier transforms, and SFOAEs in impaired ears.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Stephen T Neely; Douglas H Keefe; Patricia A Dorn; Emily Cyr; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Quantitative assessment of human cochlear function by evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  P Avan; P Bonfils; D Loth; P Narcy; J Trotoux
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  The origin of SFOAE microstructure in the guinea pig.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Robert H Withnell; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  Neural Encoding of Amplitude Modulations in the Human Efferent System.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Milan Biswal
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-29

2.  Exploration of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela E Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.117

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.