Literature DB >> 30409510

High frequency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission measurements using chirp and click stimuli.

Douglas H Keefe1, M Patrick Feeney2, Lisa L Hunter3, Denis F Fitzpatrick4, Chelsea M Blankenship5, Angela C Garinis6, Daniel B Putterman7, Marcin Wróblewski8.   

Abstract

Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) at high frequencies are a non-invasive physiological test of basilar membrane mechanics at the basal end, and have clinical potential to detect risk of hearing loss related to outer-hair-cell dysfunction. Using stimuli with constant incident pressure across frequency, TEOAEs were measured in experiment 1 at low frequencies (0.7-8 kHz) and high frequencies (7.1-14.7 kHz) in adults with normal hearing up to 8 kHz and varying hearing levels from 9 to 16 kHz. In combination with click stimuli, chirp stimuli were used with slow, medium and fast sweep rates for which the local frequency increased or decreased with time. Chirp TEOAEs were transformed into equivalent click TEOAEs by inverse filtering out chirp stimulus phase, and analyzed similarly to click TEOAEs. To improve detection above 8 kHz, TEOAEs were measured in experiment 2 with higher-level stimuli and longer averaging times. These changes increased the TEOAE signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by 10 dB. Slower sweep rates were investigated but the elicited TEOAEs were detected in fewer ears compared to faster rates. Data were acquired in adults and children (age 11-17 y), including children with cystic fibrosis (CF) treated with ototoxic antibiotics. Test-retest measurements revealed satisfactory repeatability of high-frequency TEOAE SNR (median of 1.3 dB) and coherence synchrony measure, despite small test-retest differences related to changes in forward and reverse transmission in the ear canal. The results suggest the potential use of such tests to screen for sensorineural hearing loss, including ototoxic loss. Experiment 2 was a feasibility study to explore TEOAE test parameters that might be used in a full-scale study to screen CF patients for risk of ototoxic hearing loss.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chirp stimulus; Cystic fibrosis; High-frequency hearing loss; Ototoxicity; Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30409510      PMCID: PMC6309488          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  39 in total

1.  Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparison of nine methods to estimate ear-canal stimulus levels.

Authors:  Natalie N Souza; Sumitrajit Dhar; Stephen T Neely; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Human middle-ear model with compound eardrum and airway branching in mastoid air cells.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration.

Authors:  Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar; Rebekah Abel; Renee Banakis; Evan Grolley; Jungwha Lee; Steven Zecker; Jonathan Siegel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Moments of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in human ears: group delay and spread, instantaneous frequency and bandwidth.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Profiles of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions from 0.5 to 20 kHz in Humans.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-28

9.  Reflection- and Distortion-Source Otoacoustic Emissions: Evidence for Increased Irregularity in the Human Cochlea During Aging.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Amanda J Ortmann; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-07-02

10.  An in-situ calibration method and the effects on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Shixiong Chen; Haoshi Zhang; Lan Wang; Guanglin Li
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  2 in total

1.  Peripheral Auditory Involvement in Childhood Listening Difficulty.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Chelsea M Blankenship; Li Lin; Nicholette T Sloat; Audrey Perdew; Hannah Stewart; David R Moore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

Review 2.  A systematic review on the effect of low-dose radiation on hearing.

Authors:  Srikanth Nayak; Arivudai Nambi; Sathish Kumar; P Hariprakash; Pradeep Yuvaraj; Basavaraj Poojar
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 1.925

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.