Literature DB >> 18397024

Low-frequency and high-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression in humans.

Michael P Gorga1, Stephen T Neely, Darcia M Dierking, Judy Kopun, Kristin Jolkowski, Kristin Groenenboom, Hongyang Tan, Bettina Stiegemann.   

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression (quantified as decrements) was measured for f(2)=500 and 4000 Hz, for a range of primary levels (L(2)), suppressor frequencies (f(3)), and suppressor levels (L(3)) in 19 normal-hearing subjects. Slopes of decrement-versus-L(3) functions were similar at both f(2) frequencies, and decreased as f(3) increased. Suppression tuning curves, constructed from decrement functions, were used to estimate (1) suppression for on- and low-frequency suppressors, (2) tip-to-tail differences, (3) Q(ERB), and (4) best frequency. Compression, estimated from the slope of functions relating suppression "threshold" to L(2) for off-frequency suppressors, was similar for 500 and 4000 Hz. Tip-to-tail differences, Q(ERB), and best frequency decreased as L(2) increased for both frequencies. However, tip-to-tail difference (an estimate of cochlear-amplifier gain) was 20 dB greater at 4000 Hz, compared to 500 Hz. Q(ERB) decreased to a greater extent with L(2) when f(2)=4000 Hz, but, on an octave scale, best frequency shifted more with level when f(2)=500 Hz. These data indicate that, at both frequencies, cochlear processing is nonlinear. Response growth and compression are similar at the two frequencies, but gain is greater at 4000 Hz and spread of excitation is greater at 500 Hz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18397024      PMCID: PMC2562758          DOI: 10.1121/1.2839138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  56 in total

1.  Acetylcholine, outer hair cell electromotility, and the cochlear amplifier.

Authors:  P Dallos; D Z He; X Lin; I Sziklai; S Mehta; B N Evans
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  On the existence of an age/threshold/frequency interaction in distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  P A Dorn; P Piskorski; D H Keefe; S T Neely; M P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The level and growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  P Kummer; T Janssen; W Arnold
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Basilar-membrane nonlinearity and the growth of forward masking.

Authors:  C J Plack; A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. II. Estimating tuning characteristics using three stimulus tones.

Authors:  D M Mills
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Mechanical amplification of stimuli by hair cells.

Authors:  A Hudspeth
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  From laboratory to clinic: a large scale study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and ears with hearing loss.

Authors:  M P Gorga; S T Neely; B Ohlrich; B Hoover; J Redner; J Peters
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  N P Cooper; W S Rhode
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Two-tone suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  A developmental study of distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) suppression in humans.

Authors:  C Abdala
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  11 in total

1.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

2.  The role of suppression in psychophysical tone-on-tone masking.

Authors:  Joyce Rodríguez; Stephen T Neely; Harisadhan Patra; Judy Kopun; Walt Jesteadt; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Growth of suppression in humans based on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Temporal aspects of suppression in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Joyce Rodriguez; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Measured Below 300 Hz in Normal-Hearing Human Subjects.

Authors:  Anders T Christensen; Rodrigo Ordoñez; Dorte Hammershøi
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-21

7.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in hearing-impaired humans.

Authors:  Alyson Gruhlke; Cori Birkholz; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Walt Jesteadt; Kendra Schmid; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Growth of suppression using distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements in hearing-impaired humans.

Authors:  Cori Birkholz; Alyson Gruhlke; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Walt Jesteadt; Kendra K Schmid; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Distortion product emissions from a cochlear model with nonlinear mechanoelectrical transduction in outer hair cells.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Liu; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission input/output characteristics in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears.

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Tiffany A Johnson; Judy Kopun; Darcia M Dierking; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.