Literature DB >> 6833157

An active cochlear model showing sharp tuning and high sensitivity.

S T Neely, D O Kim.   

Abstract

Recent in vivo measurements of cochlear-partition motion indicate very high sensitivity and sharp mechanical tuning similar to the tuning of single cochlear nerve fibers. Our experience with mathematical models of the cochlea leads us to believe that this type of mechanical response requires the presence of active elements in the cochlea. We have developed an active cochlear model which incorporates negative damping components; this model produces partition displacement in good agreement with many of the mechanical and neural tuning characteristics which have been observed in vivo by other researchers. We suggest that the negative damping components of our model may represent an active mechanical behavior of the outer hair cells, functioning in the electromechanical environment of the normal cochlea.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6833157     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(83)90022-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  42 in total

1.  Mechanical bases of frequency tuning and neural excitation at the base of the cochlea: comparison of basilar-membrane vibrations and auditory-nerve-fiber responses in chinchilla.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; S S Narayan; A N Temchin; A Recio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Tectorial membrane morphological variation: effects upon stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; David S Velenovsky; Kevin E Bonine
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Is there a close relationship between changes in amplitudes of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hair cell damage after exposure to realistic industrial noise in guinea pigs?

Authors:  V Linss; E Emmerich; F Richter; W Linss
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Measurement of the mechanical properties of isolated tectorial membrane using atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Rachel Gueta; David Barlam; Roni Z Shneck; Itay Rousso
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A canonical oscillator model of cochlear dynamics.

Authors:  Karl D Lerud; Ji Chul Kim; Felix V Almonte; Laurel H Carney; Edward W Large
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Acetylcholine, outer hair cell electromotility, and the cochlear amplifier.

Authors:  P Dallos; D Z He; X Lin; I Sziklai; S Mehta; B N Evans
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  In vivo impedance of the gerbil cochlear partition at auditory frequencies.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Low-frequency and high-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Judy Kopun; Kristin Jolkowski; Kristin Groenenboom; Hongyang Tan; Bettina Stiegemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.

Authors:  Uzma Shaheen Wilson; Jenna Browning-Kamins; Sriram Boothalingam; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.