Literature DB >> 21361437

Specification of absorbed-sound power in the ear canal: application to suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Douglas H Keefe1, Kim S Schairer.   

Abstract

An insert ear-canal probe including sound source and microphone can deliver a calibrated sound power level to the ear. The aural power absorbed is proportional to the product of mean-squared forward pressure, ear-canal area, and absorbance, in which the sound field is represented using forward (reverse) waves traveling toward (away from) the eardrum. Forward pressure is composed of incident pressure and its multiple internal reflections between eardrum and probe. Based on a database of measurements in normal-hearing adults from 0.22 to 8 kHz, the transfer-function level of forward relative to incident pressure is boosted below 0.7 kHz and within 4 dB above. The level of forward relative to total pressure is maximal close to 4 kHz with wide variability across ears. A spectrally flat incident-pressure level across frequency produces a nearly flat absorbed power level, in contrast to 19 dB changes in pressure level. Calibrating an ear-canal sound source based on absorbed power may be useful in audiological and research applications. Specifying the tip-to-tail level difference of the suppression tuning curve of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions in terms of absorbed power reveals increased cochlear gain at 8 kHz relative to the level difference measured using total pressure.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21361437      PMCID: PMC3070993          DOI: 10.1121/1.3531796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  34 in total

1.  Acoustic reflex detection using wide-band acoustic reflectance, admittance, and power measurements.

Authors:  M P Feeney; D H Keefe
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Wideband reflectance tympanometry in normal adults.

Authors:  R H Margolis; G L Saly; D H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Prediction of conductive hearing loss based on acoustic ear-canal response using a multivariate clinical decision theory.

Authors:  P Piskorski; D H Keefe; J L Simmons; M P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Maturation of the middle and external ears: acoustic power-based responses and reflectance tympanometry.

Authors:  D H Keefe; E Levi
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Comparison between intensity and pressure as measures of sound level in the ear canal.

Authors:  S T Neely; M P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Otoreflectance of the cochlea and middle ear.

Authors:  D H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Audiometric predictions using stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and middle ear measurements.

Authors:  John C Ellison; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Ear-canal impedance and reflection coefficient in human infants and adults.

Authors:  D H Keefe; J C Bulen; K H Arehart; E M Burns
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Pressure transfer function and absorption cross section from the diffuse field to the human infant ear canal.

Authors:  D H Keefe; J C Bulen; S L Campbell; E M Burns
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Theory of forward and reverse middle-ear transmission applied to otoacoustic emissions in infant and adult ears.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  13 in total

1.  Further assessment of forward pressure level for in situ calibration.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Shawn S Goodman; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Age Effects on Cochlear Reflectance in Adults.

Authors:  Sara E Fultz; Kenneth I Vaden; Daniel M Rasetshwane; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Comparison of nine methods to estimate ear-canal stimulus levels.

Authors:  Natalie N Souza; Sumitrajit Dhar; Stephen T Neely; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparing otoacoustic emissions evoked by chirp transients with constant absorbed sound power and constant incident pressure magnitude.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Human middle-ear model with compound eardrum and airway branching in mastoid air cells.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration.

Authors:  Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar; Rebekah Abel; Renee Banakis; Evan Grolley; Jungwha Lee; Steven Zecker; Jonathan Siegel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Procedures for ambient-pressure and tympanometric tests of aural acoustic reflectance and admittance in human infants and adults.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; M Patrick Feeney; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Moments of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in human ears: group delay and spread, instantaneous frequency and bandwidth.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Measurements of wide-band cochlear reflectance in humans.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-12

10.  Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.

Authors:  Daniel B Putterman; Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; Angela C Garinis; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Garnett P McMillan; M Patrick Feeney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.