Literature DB >> 18066624

Discrimination of Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Ward R Drennan1, Jeff K Longnion, Chad Ruffin, Jay T Rubinstein.   

Abstract

The temporal fine structure (TFS) of sound contributes significantly to the perception of music and speech in noise. The evaluation of new strategies to improve TFS delivery in cochlear implants (CIs) relies upon the assessment of fine structure encoding. Most modern CI sound processing schemes do not encode within-channel TFS per se, but some TFS information is delivered through temporal envelope cues across multiple channels. Positive and negative Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes differ primarily in acoustic TFS and provide a potential test of TFS discrimination ability in CI users for current and future processing strategies. The ability to discriminate Schroeder-phase stimuli was evaluated in 24 CI users and 7 normal-hearing listeners at four fundamental frequencies: 50, 100, 200, and 400 Hz. The dependent variables were percent correct at each fundamental frequency, average score across all fundamental frequencies, and a maximum-likelihood-predicted threshold fundamental frequency for 75% correct. CI listeners scored better than chance for all fundamental frequencies tested. The 50-Hz, average, and predicted threshold scores correlated significantly with consonant-nucleus-consonant word scores. The 200-Hz score correlated with a measure of speech perception in speech-shaped noise. Pitch-direction sensitivity is predicted jointly by the 400-Hz Schroeder score and a spectral ripple discrimination task. The results demonstrate that the Schroeder test is a potentially useful measure of clinically relevant temporal processing abilities in CI users.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18066624      PMCID: PMC2536810          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-007-0107-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  39 in total

1.  Detection of small across-channel timing differences by cochlear implantees.

Authors:  R P Carlyon; L Geurts; J Wouters
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Basilar-membrane responses to multicomponent (Schroeder-phase) signals: understanding intensity effects.

Authors:  Van Summers; Egbert de Boer; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Frédéric Berthommier; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Minimum audible angle, just noticeable interaural differences and speech intelligibility with bilateral cochlear implants using clinical speech processors.

Authors:  Pascal Senn; Martin Kompis; Mattheus Vischer; Rudolf Haeusler
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Effects of temporal fine structure on the lateralization of speech and on speech understanding in noise.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Vasant K Dasika; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-27

6.  Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-21

7.  Phase effects in masking related to dispersion in the inner ear. II. Masking period patterns of short targets.

Authors:  A Kohlrausch; A Sander
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Masking of tones and speech by Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  V Summers; M R Leek
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Perception of static and dynamic acoustic cues to place of articulation in initial stop consonants.

Authors:  D Kewley-Port; D B Pisoni; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Loudness summation, masking, and temporal interaction for sensations produced by electric stimulation of two sites in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Y C Tong; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  26 in total

1.  Comparing the effects of reverberation and of noise on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic listening.

Authors:  Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Psychoacoustic performance and music and speech perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kyu Hwan Jung; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Elyse Jameyson; Gary Miyasaki; Susan J Norton; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  The ability of cochlear implant users to use temporal envelope cues recovered from speech frequency modulation.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Christian Lorenzi; Kaibao Nie; Xing Li; Elyse M Jameyson; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

5.  Discrimination of time-reversed harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Michelle Molis; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-08-25

6.  Acoustic temporal modulation detection in normal-hearing and cochlear implanted listeners: effects of hearing mechanism and development.

Authors:  Min-Hyun Park; Jong Ho Won; David L Horn; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-20

7.  Spectral and temporal analysis of simulated dead regions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Gary L Jones; Il Joon Moon; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-05

8.  Psychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Robert S Kang; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Use of amplitude modulation cues recovered from frequency modulation for cochlear implant users when original speech cues are severely degraded.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Hyun Joon Shim; Christian Lorenzi; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-15

10.  Nonlinguistic Outcome Measures in Adult Cochlear Implant Users Over the First Year of Implantation.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Alden O Timme; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.