Literature DB >> 25740402

Spectral and temporal analysis of simulated dead regions in cochlear implants.

Jong Ho Won1, Gary L Jones, Il Joon Moon, Jay T Rubinstein.   

Abstract

A cochlear implant (CI) electrode in a "cochlear dead region" will excite neighboring neural populations. In previous research that simulated such dead regions, stimulus information in the simulated dead region was either added to the immediately adjacent frequency regions or dropped entirely. There was little difference in speech perception ability between the two conditions. This may imply that there may be little benefit of ensuring that stimulus information on an electrode in a suspected cochlear dead region is transmitted. Alternatively, performance may be enhanced by a broader frequency redistribution, rather than adding stimuli from the dead region to the edges. In the current experiments, cochlear dead regions were introduced by excluding selected CI electrodes or vocoder noise-bands. Participants were assessed for speech understanding as well as spectral and temporal sensitivities as a function of the size of simulated dead regions. In one set of tests, the normal input frequency range of the sound processor was distributed among the active electrodes in bands with approximately logarithmic spacing ("redistributed" maps); in the remaining tests, information in simulated dead regions was dropped ("dropped" maps). Word recognition and Schroeder-phase discrimination performance, which require both spectral and temporal sensitivities, decreased as the size of simulated dead regions increased, but the redistributed and dropped remappings showed similar performance in these two tasks. Psychoacoustic experiments showed that the near match in word scores may reflect a tradeoff between spectral and temporal sensitivity: spectral-ripple discrimination was substantially degraded in the redistributed condition relative to the dropped condition while performance in a temporal modulation detection task degraded in the dropped condition but remained constant in the redistributed condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25740402      PMCID: PMC4368650          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-014-0502-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  47 in total

1.  Recognition of spectrally degraded and frequency-shifted vowels in acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  FURTHER OBSERVATIONS ON THE PATHOLOGY OF PRESBYCUSIS.

Authors:  H F SCHUKNECHT
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1964-10

3.  Frequency-place compression and expansion in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Deniz Başkent; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Interactions between cochlear implant electrode insertion depth and frequency-place mapping.

Authors:  Deniz Başkent; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition.

Authors:  Li Xu; Catherine S Thompson; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Factors affecting the use of noise-band vocoders as acoustic models for pitch perception in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Johan Laneau; Marc Moonen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.

Authors:  Kaibao Nie; Amy Barco; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Frequency transposition around dead regions simulated with a noiseband vocoder.

Authors:  Deniz Başkent; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Revised CNC lists for auditory tests.

Authors:  G E PETERSON; I LEHISTE
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1962-02

10.  Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; D Rainey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners.

Authors:  David L Horn; Daniel J Dudley; Kavita Dedhia; Kaibao Nie; Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  The Physiologic and Psychophysical Consequences of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

3.  Spectral Ripple Discrimination in Normal-Hearing Infants.

Authors:  David L Horn; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 4.  Considerations for Fitting Cochlear Implants Bimodally and to the Single-Sided Deaf.

Authors:  Sabrina H Pieper; Noura Hamze; Stefan Brill; Sabine Hochmuth; Mats Exter; Marek Polak; Andreas Radeloff; Michael Buschermöhle; Mathias Dietz
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

5.  The Characteristics of Adults with Severe Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover; Michael Blackburn; Frederick Gallun
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Vowel and consonant confusions from spectrally manipulated stimuli designed to simulate poor cochlear implant electrode-neuron interfaces.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Richard A Wright; Matthew B Winn; Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.840

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.