Literature DB >> 25790949

Acoustic temporal modulation detection in normal-hearing and cochlear implanted listeners: effects of hearing mechanism and development.

Min-Hyun Park1, Jong Ho Won, David L Horn, Jay T Rubinstein.   

Abstract

Temporal modulation detection ability matures over many years after birth and may be particularly sensitive to experience during this period. Profound hearing loss during early childhood might result in greater perceptual deficits than a similar loss beginning in adulthood. We tested this idea by measuring performance in temporal modulation detection in profoundly deaf children and adults fitted with cochlear implants (CIs). At least two independent variables could constrain temporal modulation detection performance in children with CIs: altered encoding of modulation information due to the CI-auditory nerve interface, and atypical development of central processing of sound information provided by CIs. The effect of altered encoding was investigated by testing subjects with one of two different hearing mechanisms (normal hearing vs. CI) and the effect of atypical development was studied by testing two different age groups. All subjects were tested for their ability to detect acoustic temporal modulations of sound amplitude. A comparison of the slope, or cutoff frequency, of the temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs) among the four subject groups revealed that temporal resolution was mainly constrained by hearing mechanism: normal-hearing listeners could detect smaller amplitude modulations at high modulation frequencies than CI users. In contrast, a comparison of the height of the TMTFs revealed a significant interaction between hearing mechanism and age group on overall sensitivity to temporal modulation: sensitivity was significantly poorer in children with CIs, relative to the other three groups. Results suggest that there is an age-specific vulnerability of intensity discrimination or non-sensory factors, which subsequently affects sensitivity to temporal modulation in prelingually deaf children who use CIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25790949      PMCID: PMC4417089          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-014-0499-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  71 in total

1.  Intensity discrimination and detection of amplitude modulation.

Authors:  M Wojtczak; N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Psychoacoustic performance and music and speech perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kyu Hwan Jung; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Elyse Jameyson; Gary Miyasaki; Susan J Norton; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Factors contributing to speech perception scores in long-term pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Peter J Blamey; Emily A Tobey; Christine A Brenner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Discrimination of Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jeff K Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-12-08

5.  Acoustic temporal modulation detection and speech perception in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Kaibao Nie; Elyse M Jameyson; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Assessing the role of spectral and intensity cues in spectral ripple detection and discrimination in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Anderson; Andrew J Oxenham; Peggy B Nelson; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Of kittens and kids: altered cortical maturation following profound deafness and cochlear implant use.

Authors:  C W Ponton; J J Eggermont
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception.

Authors:  R Drullman; J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds.

Authors:  N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Speech and language development in cognitively delayed children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Rachael Frush Holt; Karen Iler Kirk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  9 in total

1.  Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners.

Authors:  David L Horn; Daniel J Dudley; Kavita Dedhia; Kaibao Nie; Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A Critical Role of Inhibition in Temporal Processing Maturation in the Primary Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Dongqin Cai; Rongrong Han; Miaomiao Liu; Fenghua Xie; Ling You; Yi Zheng; Limin Zhao; Jun Yao; Yiwei Wang; Yin Yue; Christoph E Schreiner; Kexin Yuan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Amplitude modulation detection and modulation masking in school-age children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Christian Lorenzi; Laurianne Cabrera; Lori J Leibold; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Amplitude modulation detection and temporal modulation cutoff frequency in normal hearing infants.

Authors:  Brian A Walker; Caitlin M Gerhards; Lynne A Werner; David L Horn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The development of auditory temporal processing during the first year of life.

Authors:  Laurianne Cabrera; Bonnie K Lau
Journal:  Hearing Balance Commun       Date:  2022-02-02

6.  Cortical Activation Patterns Correlate with Speech Understanding After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Cristen Olds; Luca Pollonini; Homer Abaya; Jannine Larky; Megan Loy; Heather Bortfeld; Michael S Beauchamp; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Age-Related Performance on Vowel Identification and the Spectral-temporally Modulated Ripple Test in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Developmental deprivation-induced perceptual and cortical processing deficits in awake-behaving animals.

Authors:  Justin D Yao; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Neural indices of listening effort in noisy environments.

Authors:  Andrew Dimitrijevic; Michael L Smith; Darren S Kadis; David R Moore
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.