Literature DB >> 17587137

Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users.

Jong Ho Won1, Ward R Drennan, Jay T Rubinstein.   

Abstract

Speech perception ability in noise is one of the most practical measures of success with a cochlear implant; however, with experience, this ability can change dramatically over time, making it a less than ideal tool for comparing performance among different processing strategies. This study examined performance on a spectral discrimination task and compared it to speech perception in noise. An adaptive procedure was used to determine the spectral-ripple density that subjects could discriminate. A closed-set, forced-choice adaptive procedure was used to determine speech reception thresholds for words in two-talker babble and in speech-shaped, steady-state noise. Spectral-ripple thresholds (ripples/octave) were significantly correlated with speech reception thresholds (dB SNR) in noise for 29 cochlear implant users (r = -0.55, p = 0.002 in two-talker babble; r = -0.62, p = 0.0004 in steady-state noise), demonstrating that better spectral resolution was associated with better speech perception in noise. A significant correlation was also found between the spectral-ripple discrimination ability and word recognition in quiet (r = 0.50, p = 0.009). In addition, test-retest reliability for spectral-ripple discrimination was good, and no learning was observed. The present study demonstrates that the spectral-ripple discrimination test, which is time efficient and nonlinguistic, would be a useful tool to evaluate cochlear implant performance with different signal processing strategies.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17587137      PMCID: PMC2538435          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-007-0085-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  24 in total

1.  Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  P C Loizou; O Poroy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The relationship between speech perception and electrode discrimination in cochlear implantees.

Authors:  B A Henry; C M McKay; H J McDermott; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Belinda A Henry; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.

Authors:  Michael K Qin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Christopher W Turner; Bruce J Gantz; Corina Vidal; Amy Behrens; Belinda A Henry
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of temporal fine structure on the lateralization of speech and on speech understanding in noise.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Vasant K Dasika; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-27

7.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise.

Authors:  R C Bilger; J M Nuetzel; W M Rabinowitz; C Rzeczkowski
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1984-03

9.  Frequency resolving power measured by rippled noise.

Authors:  V V Popov; O N Milekhina; M B Tarakanov
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  M R Leek; M F Dorman; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  128 in total

1.  Psychoacoustic performance and music and speech perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kyu Hwan Jung; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Elyse Jameyson; Gary Miyasaki; Susan J Norton; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  A psychophysical method for measuring spatial resolution in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Mahan Azadpour; Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-15

3.  Evidence of across-channel processing for spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Gary L Jones; Ward R Drennan; Elyse M Jameyson; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Cochlear implant users' spectral ripple resolution.

Authors:  Eun Kyung Jeon; Christopher W Turner; Sue A Karsten; Belinda A Henry; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Jong Ho Won; Il Joon Moon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Effects of Age and Cochlear Implantation on Spectrally Cued Speech Categorization.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Julie G Arenberg; Anne L R Duchen; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners.

Authors:  David L Horn; Daniel J Dudley; Kavita Dedhia; Kaibao Nie; Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Factors Affecting Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients Implanted With a Perimodiolar Electrode Array Located in Scala Tympani.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Rosalie M Uchanski; Noël Y Dwyer; Timothy A Holden
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Validation of a clinical assessment of spectral-ripple resolution for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Elizabeth S Anderson; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; Susannah Dixon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.