Literature DB >> 3722606

Loudness summation, masking, and temporal interaction for sensations produced by electric stimulation of two sites in the human cochlea.

Y C Tong, G M Clark.   

Abstract

Three psychophysical studies were conducted on two multichannel cochlear implant patients. The first study investigated the amount of loudness summation as a function of the spatial separation between two bipolar electrode pairs in the cochlea. Summation was found to increase in an orderly way with the separation between the two electrode pairs. This observation suggested that loudness was related to the distribution of discharge rate of auditory neurons along the cochlea for electric stimulation, and a model of loudness summation formulated on the basis of a functional relationship between loudness and the discharge rate distribution was proposed. The second study investigated the possibility of estimating the discharge rate distribution by means of masking. The amount of masking was found to decrease in an orderly fashion with the spatial separation between the masker and probe electrode pairs. This pattern of masking is consistent with the physiological and modeling observation that the current and neural discharge rate distributions produced by an electrode pair (masker) in the cochlea are approximately bell shaped with gradually decaying borders. The third study investigated the just-discriminable changes in the temporal delay between two interleaving pulse trains delivered, respectively, to two electrode pairs in the cochlea. Discrimination performance was found to decrease with the spatial separation between the two electrode pairs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3722606     DOI: 10.1121/1.393203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

Review 1.  The multiple-channel cochlear implant: the interface between sound and the central nervous system for hearing, speech, and language in deaf people-a personal perspective.

Authors:  Graeme M Clark
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-10-20

3.  Electrically evoked compound action potential measures for virtual channels versus physical electrodes.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Adam M Goulson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-11-04

5.  Current-level discrimination in the context of interleaved, multichannel stimulation in cochlear implants: effects of number of stimulated electrodes, pulse rate, and electrode separation.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-06-21

6.  Discrimination of Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jeff K Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-12-08

7.  Spatial and temporal effects of interleaved masking in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bom Jun Kwon; Chris van den Honert
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-06-03

8.  Effects of electrode separation between speech and noise signals on consonant identification in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bom Jun Kwon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Binaural unmasking with multiple adjacent masking electrodes in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Thomas Lu; Ruth Litovsky; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of stimulus level and rate on psychophysical thresholds for interleaved pulse trains in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.