Literature DB >> 17332969

Effects of temporal fine structure on the lateralization of speech and on speech understanding in noise.

Ward R Drennan1, Jong Ho Won, Vasant K Dasika, Jay T Rubinstein.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the role of temporal fine structure in the lateralization and understanding of speech in six normal-hearing listeners. Interaural time differences (ITDs) were introduced to invoke lateralization. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were evaluated in backgrounds of two-talker babble and speech-shaped noise. Two-syllable words with ITDs of 0 and 700 micros were used as targets. A vocoder technique, which systematically randomized fine structure, was used to evaluate the effects of fine structure on these tasks. Randomization of temporal fine structure was found to significantly reduce the ability of normal-hearing listeners to lateralize words, although for many listeners, good lateralization performance was achieved with as much as 80% fine-structure randomization. Most listeners demonstrated some rudimentary ability to lateralize with 100% fine-structure randomization. When ITDs were 0 micros, randomization of fine structure had a much greater effect on SRT in two-talker babble than in speech-shaped noise. Binaural advantages were also observed. In steady noise, the difference in SRT between words with 0- vs 700-micros ITDs was, on average, 6 dB with no fine-structure randomization and 2 dB with 100% fine-structure randomization. In two-talker babble this difference was 1.9 dB and, for most listeners, showed little effect of the degree of fine-structure randomization. These results suggest that (1) improved delivery of temporal fine structure would improve speech understanding in noise for implant recipients, (2) bilateral implant recipients might benefit from temporal envelope ITDs, and (3) improved delivery of temporal information could improve binaural benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17332969      PMCID: PMC2538430          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-007-0074-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  36 in total

1.  Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with different fundamental frequencies.

Authors:  P F Assmann; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization.

Authors:  F L Wightman; D J Kistler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Lateralization of high frequencies based on interaural time differences.

Authors:  D McFadden; E G Pasanen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A new approach to comparing binaural masking level differences at low and high frequencies.

Authors:  S van de Par; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A unitary model of pitch perception.

Authors:  R Meddis; L O'Mard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise.

Authors:  A W Bronkhorst; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Detectability of interaural delay in high-frequency complex waveforms.

Authors:  G B Henning
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Sound localization in noise: the effect of signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  M D Good; R H Gilkey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0.

Authors:  J F Culling; C J Darwin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  14 in total

1.  Discrimination of Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jeff K Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-12-08

2.  Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-21

3.  Speech identification based on temporal fine structure cues.

Authors:  Stanley Sheft; Marine Ardoint; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Tuning in the spatial dimension: evidence from a masked speech identification task.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Relationship between behavioral and physiological spectral-ripple discrimination.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Christopher G Clinard; Seeyoun Kwon; Vasant K Dasika; Kaibao Nie; Ward R Drennan; Kelly L Tremblay; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-27

6.  Perception of pure tones and iterated rippled noise for normal hearing and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Richard T Penninger; Wade W Chien; Patpong Jiradejvong; Emily Boeke; Courtney L Carver; Charles J Limb
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-03

7.  Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Christine R Mason; Timothy M Streeter; Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: evidence from human frequency-following response recordings.

Authors:  Christopher G Clinard; Kelly L Tremblay; Ananthanarayan R Krishnan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Effects of training on recognition of musical instruments presented through cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Virginia D Driscoll; Jacob Oleson; Dingfeng Jiang; Kate Gfeller
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Temporal-envelope reconstruction for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Christian Lorenzi; Nicolas Wallaert; Dan Gnansia; Agnès Claire Leger; David Timothy Ives; André Chays; Stéphane Garnier; Yves Cazals
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.