Literature DB >> 9606069

Masking of tones and speech by Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

V Summers1, M R Leek.   

Abstract

Tone detection and sentence recognition were measured for normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners using maskers consisting of harmonic series with components summed in positive or negative Schroeder phase. Each task was carried out with the signal set at 60, 70, or 80 dB SPL. For listeners with normal hearing, positive Schroeder-phase complexes masked tones and sentences less than negative Schroeder-phase maskers. In the two experimental tasks, to achieve the same amount of masking, positive Schroeder-phase complexes had to be set as much as 12-15 dB higher than negative Schroeder-phase complexes. Large phase effects were observed on both tasks at all three test levels. The two maskers were more nearly equal in effectiveness in the presence of cochlear damage. The findings support an interpretation that involves differences in the shape of the basilar-membrane waveform generated by each masker and active cochlear processing which enhances the internal signal-to-masker ratio for signals presented in the positive Schroeder masker. This spectral enhancement appears to require nonlinear active gain that is characteristic of normal auditory processing at moderate presentation levels. The results of the sentence recognition task suggest that group differences observed in tone detection transfer fairly directly to speech perception under masking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9606069     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(98)00030-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  19 in total

1.  Psychoacoustic performance and music and speech perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kyu Hwan Jung; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Elyse Jameyson; Gary Miyasaki; Susan J Norton; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Estimates of auditory filter phase response at and below characteristic frequency.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Stephan D Ewert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Discrimination of Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jeff K Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-12-08

4.  Discrimination of time-reversed harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Michelle Molis; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-08-25

5.  Phase effects in masking by harmonic complexes: detection of bands of speech-shaped noise.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; John F Culling; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Exploring the role of feedback-based auditory reflexes in forward masking by schroeder-phase complexes.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-22

7.  Roles of the target and masker fundamental frequencies in voice segregation.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; John F Culling; Monita Chatterjee; Charles J Limb
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Phase effects in masking by harmonic complexes: speech recognition.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; John F Culling; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  On- and off-frequency forward masking by Schroeder-phase complexes.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-07-21

10.  Psychophysical evidence of damaged active processing mechanisms in Belgian Waterslager Canaries.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Robert J Dooling; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.