Literature DB >> 19705203

Discrimination of time-reversed harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Amanda M Lauer1, Michelle Molis, Marjorie R Leek.   

Abstract

Normal-hearing (NH) listeners and hearing-impaired (HI) listeners detected and discriminated time-reversed harmonic complexes constructed of equal-amplitude harmonic components with fundamental frequencies (F0s) ranging from 50 to 800 Hz. Component starting phases were selected according to the positive and negative Schroeder-phase algorithms to produce within-period frequency sweeps with relatively flat temporal envelopes. Detection thresholds were not affected by component starting phases for either group of listeners. At presentation levels of 80 dB SPL, NH listeners could discriminate the two waveforms nearly perfectly when the F0s were less than 300-400 Hz but fell to chance performance for higher F0s. HI listeners performed significantly poorer, with reduced discrimination at several of the F0s. In contrast, at a lower presentation level meant to nearly equate sensation levels for the two groups, NH listeners' discrimination was poorer than HI listeners at most F0s. Roving presentation levels had little effect on performance by NH listeners but reduced performance by HI listeners. The differential impact of roving level suggests a weaker perception of timbre differences and a greater susceptibility to the detrimental effects of experimental uncertainty in HI listeners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19705203      PMCID: PMC2774415          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-009-0182-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  51 in total

1.  Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. II. Selective attention and learning under various levels of stimulus uncertainty.

Authors:  C S Watson; W J Kelly; H W Wroton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Temporal gap resolution in listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  P J Fitzgibbons; S Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Phase effects in masking related to dispersion in the inner ear.

Authors:  B K Smith; U K Sieben; A Kohlrausch; M R Schroeder
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Consequences of peripheral frequency selectivity for nonsimultaneous masking.

Authors:  H Duifhuis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Gap detection in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  P J Fitzgibbons; F L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  R S Tyler; Q Summerfield; E J Wood; M A Fernandes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The minimum detectable duration of auditory signals for normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  R J Irwin; S C Purdy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Temporal gap detection in sensorineural and simulated hearing impairments.

Authors:  M Florentine; S Buus
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1984-09

10.  Temporal acuity in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  R J Irwin; L K Hinchcliff; S Kemp
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1981
View more
  4 in total

1.  Psychoacoustic performance and music and speech perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kyu Hwan Jung; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Elyse Jameyson; Gary Miyasaki; Susan J Norton; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Spectral and temporal measures in hybrid cochlear implant users: on the mechanism of electroacoustic hearing benefits.

Authors:  Justin S Golub; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Tina D Worman; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Detection of acoustic temporal fine structure by cochlear implant listeners: behavioral results and computational modeling.

Authors:  Nikita S Imennov; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Elyse Jameyson; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Influence of Tinnitus on Auditory Spectral and Temporal Resolution and Speech Perception in Tinnitus Patients.

Authors:  Il Joon Moon; Jong Ho Won; Hyun Woo Kang; Dong Hyun Kim; Yong-Hwi An; Hyun Joon Shim
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.