Literature DB >> 18816426

Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities.

Ward R Drennan1, Jay T Rubinstein.   

Abstract

This article describes issues concerning music perception with cochlear implants, discusses why music perception is usually poor in cochlear implant users, reviews relevant data, and describes approaches for improving music perception with cochlear implants. Pitch discrimination ability ranges from the ability to hear a one-semitone difference to a two-octave difference. The ability to hear rhythm and tone duration is near normal in implantees. Timbre perception is usually poor, but about two-thirds of listeners can identify instruments in a closed set better than chance. Cochlear implant recipients typically have poor melody perception but are aided with rhythm and lyrics. Without rhythm or lyrics, only about one-third of implantees can identify common melodies in a closed set better than chance. Correlations have been found between music perception ability and speech understanding in noisy environments. Thus, improving music perception might also provide broader clinical benefit. A number of approaches have been proposed to improve music perception with implant users, including encoding fundamental frequency with modulation, "current-steering," MP3-like processing, and nerve "conditioning." If successful, these approaches could improve the quality of life for implantees by improving communication and musical and environmental awareness.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18816426      PMCID: PMC2628814          DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2007.08.0118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  53 in total

1.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; D Rainey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Discrimination of Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jeff K Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-12-08

4.  Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-21

5.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  J T Rubinstein; B S Wilson; C C Finley; P J Abbas
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Physiological considerations in artificial stimulation of the inner ear.

Authors:  N Y Kiang; E C Moxon
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: implications for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  J B Nadol; Y S Young; R J Glynn
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  Diameter of the cochlear nerve in deaf humans: implications for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  J B Nadol; W Z Xu
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Grace L Nimmons; Robert S Kang; Ward R Drennan; Jeff Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Tina Worman; Bevan Yueh; Jay T Rubenstien
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  61 in total

1.  Preservation of rhythmic clocking in cochlear implant users: a study of isochronous versus anisochronous beat detection.

Authors:  Irene Kim; Eunice Yang; Patrick J Donnelly; Charles J Limb
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-09

2.  Psychophysiological analyses demonstrate the importance of neural envelope coding for speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Early unilateral cochlear implantation promotes mature cortical asymmetries in adolescents who are deaf.

Authors:  Salima Jiwani; Blake C Papsin; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  AAV-Mediated Neurotrophin Gene Therapy Promotes Improved Survival of Cochlear Spiral Ganglion Neurons in Neonatally Deafened Cats: Comparison of AAV2-hBDNF and AAV5-hGDNF.

Authors:  Patricia A Leake; Stephen J Rebscher; Chantale Dore'; Omar Akil
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-20

5.  Music perception and appraisal: cochlear implant users and simulated cochlear implant listening.

Authors:  Rose Wright; Rosalie M Uchanski
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Characteristics and determinants of music appreciation in adult CI users.

Authors:  Birgit Philips; Bart Vinck; Eddy De Vel; Leen Maes; Wendy D'Haenens; Hannah Keppler; Ingeborg Dhooge
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Hybrid Music Perception Outcomes: Implications for Melody and Timbre Recognition in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Aaron J Parkinson; Jay T Rubinstein; Ward R Drennan; Christa Dodson; Kaibao Nie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 8.  Psychophysical properties of low-frequency hearing: implications for perceiving speech and music via electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

9.  The effect of symmetrical and asymmetrical hearing impairment on music quality perception.

Authors:  Yuexin Cai; Fei Zhao; Yuebo Chen; Maojin Liang; Ling Chen; Haidi Yang; Hao Xiong; Xueyuan Zhang; Yiqing Zheng
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  The effect of visual cues on auditory stream segregation in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Jeremy Marozeau; Hamish Innes-Brown; David B Grayden; Anthony N Burkitt; Peter J Blamey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.