Literature DB >> 26656317

Nonlinguistic Outcome Measures in Adult Cochlear Implant Users Over the First Year of Implantation.

Ward R Drennan1, Jong Ho Won, Alden O Timme, Jay T Rubinstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Postlingually deaf cochlear implant users' speech perception improves over several months after implantation due to a learning process which involves integration of the new acoustic information presented by the device. Basic tests of hearing acuity might evaluate sensitivity to the new acoustic information and be less sensitive to learning effects. It was hypothesized that, unlike speech perception, basic spectral and temporal discrimination abilities will not change over the first year of implant use. If there were limited change over time and the test scores were correlated with clinical outcome, the tests might be useful for acute diagnostic assessments of hearing ability and also useful for testing speakers of any language, many of which do not have validated speech tests.
DESIGN: Ten newly implanted cochlear implant users were tested for speech understanding in quiet and in noise at 1 and 12 months postactivation. Spectral-ripple discrimination, temporal-modulation detection, and Schroeder-phase discrimination abilities were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postactivation.
RESULTS: Speech understanding in quiet improved between 1 and 12 months postactivation (mean 8% improvement). Speech in noise performance showed no statistically significant improvement. Mean spectral-ripple discrimination thresholds and temporal-modulation detection thresholds for modulation frequencies of 100 Hz and above also showed no significant improvement. Spectral-ripple discrimination thresholds were significantly correlated with speech understanding. Low FM detection and Schroeder-phase discrimination abilities improved over the period. Individual learning trends varied, but the majority of listeners followed the same stable pattern as group data.
CONCLUSIONS: Spectral-ripple discrimination ability and temporal-modulation detection at 100-Hz modulation and above might serve as a useful diagnostic tool for early acute assessment of cochlear implant outcome for listeners speaking any native language.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26656317      PMCID: PMC4844843          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  45 in total

1.  Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Shelley Witt; Mary Adamek; Maureen Mehr; Jenny Rogers; Julie Stordahl; Shelly Ringgenberg
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Belinda A Henry; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Christopher W Turner; Bruce J Gantz; Corina Vidal; Amy Behrens; Belinda A Henry
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants: "Perceptual Attention" Versus "Auditory Sensitivity".

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable.

Authors:  A R Thornton; M J Raffin
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1978-09

7.  Speech perception after cochlear implantation over a 4-year time period.

Authors:  Seung-Ha Oh; Chong-Sun Kim; Eun Joo Kang; Dong Soo Lee; Hyo Jeong Lee; Sun O Chang; Soon-Hyun Ahn; Chan Ho Hwang; Hong Ju Park; Ja Won Koo
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  Relationships Among Peripheral and Central Electrophysiological Measures of Spatial and Spectral Selectivity and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Auditory temporal resolution in birds: discrimination of harmonic complexes.

Authors:  Robert J Dooling; Marjorie R Leek; Otto Gleich; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  13 in total

1.  Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners.

Authors:  David L Horn; Daniel J Dudley; Kavita Dedhia; Kaibao Nie; Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparison of the Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test With the Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Marshall Lawler; Jeffrey Yu; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Intensity Discrimination and Speech Recognition of Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Natalie Rickard; Katherine Henshall
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-17

4.  Cognitive Abilities Contribute to Spectro-Temporal Discrimination in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.

Authors:  Benjamin J Kirby; Meredith Spratford; Kelsey E Klein; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Frequency change detection and speech perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Gabrielle Underwood; Kelli McGuire; Chun Liang; David R Moore; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Spectral Ripple Discrimination in Normal-Hearing Infants.

Authors:  David L Horn; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Effect of Increased Daily Cochlear Implant Use on Auditory Perception in Adults.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.674

8.  Distortion of Spectral Ripples Through Cochlear Implants Has Major Implications for Interpreting Performance Scores.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Gabrielle O'Brien
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Spectral Modulation Detection Performance and Speech Perception in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Rosalie M Uchanski
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 1.636

10.  Age-Related Performance on Vowel Identification and the Spectral-temporally Modulated Ripple Test in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.