Literature DB >> 24532186

Use of amplitude modulation cues recovered from frequency modulation for cochlear implant users when original speech cues are severely degraded.

Jong Ho Won1, Hyun Joon Shim, Christian Lorenzi, Jay T Rubinstein.   

Abstract

Won et al. (J Acoust Soc Am 132:1113-1119, 2012) reported that cochlear implant (CI) speech processors generate amplitude-modulation (AM) cues recovered from broadband speech frequency modulation (FM) and that CI users can use these cues for speech identification in quiet. The present study was designed to extend this finding for a wide range of listening conditions, where the original speech cues were severely degraded by manipulating either the acoustic signals or the speech processor. The manipulation of the acoustic signals included the presentation of background noise, simulation of reverberation, and amplitude compression. The manipulation of the speech processor included changing the input dynamic range and the number of channels. For each of these conditions, multiple levels of speech degradation were tested. Speech identification was measured for CI users and compared for stimuli having both AM and FM information (intact condition) or FM information only (FM condition). Each manipulation degraded speech identification performance for both intact and FM conditions. Performance for the intact and FM conditions became similar for stimuli having the most severe degradations. Identification performance generally overlapped for the intact and FM conditions. Moreover, identification performance for the FM condition was better than chance performance even at the maximum level of distortion. Finally, significant correlations were found between speech identification scores for the intact and FM conditions. Altogether, these results suggest that despite poor frequency selectivity, CI users can make efficient use of AM cues recovered from speech FM in difficult listening situations.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24532186      PMCID: PMC4010597          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-014-0444-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  48 in total

1.  Contribution of frequency modulation to speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Ginger S Stickney; Kaibao Nie; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The ability of listeners to use recovered envelope cues from speech fine structure.

Authors:  Gaëtan Gilbert; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Measuring the acoustic effects of compression amplification on speech in noise.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Lorienne M Jenstad; Kumiko T Boike
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Discrimination of Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jeff K Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-12-08

5.  Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-21

6.  Temporal envelope changes of compression and speech rate: combined effects on recognition for older adults.

Authors:  Lorienne M Jenstad; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  A detailed study on the effects of noise on speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Finn Dubbelboer; Tammo Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Simulating the effect of spread of excitation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Mohamed Bingabr; Blas Espinoza-Varas; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Performance of patients using different cochlear implant systems: effects of input dynamic range.

Authors:  Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman; Louise H Loiselle
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure.

Authors:  Christian Lorenzi; Gaëtan Gilbert; Héloïse Carn; Stéphane Garnier; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  Nonlinguistic Outcome Measures in Adult Cochlear Implant Users Over the First Year of Implantation.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Alden O Timme; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Agnès C Léger; Charlotte M Reed; Joseph G Desloge; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Electro-Haptic Stimulation: A New Approach for Improving Cochlear-Implant Listening.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Carl A Verschuur
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection and Speech Perception by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Il Joon Moon; Sunhwa Jin; Heesung Park; Jihwan Woo; Yang-Sun Cho; Won-Ho Chung; Sung Hwa Hong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.