Literature DB >> 17216294

Assessment of cup position from plain radiographs: impact of pelvic tilting.

M Haenle1, A Heitner, W Mittelmeier, R Barbano, R Scholz, E Steinhauser, R Bader.   

Abstract

The acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty (THA) regarding its inclination and version angles are influential parameters concerning the postoperative range of motion and dislocation stability. Standard anterior-posterior X-rays remain an important diagnostic instrument to observe the postoperative outcome and to secure quality control after THA, where an optimal positioning of the patient is recommended when taking these X-rays. The purpose of this preliminary study was to determine the effect of pelvic tilting regarding the positioning calculation of the acetabular cup from standard radiographs using a modified method according to Pettersson et al. (Acta Radiol Diagn, 23:259-263, 1982). In our model experiment, we were able to show that pelvic tilting to either side causes a considerable difference between the radiographic and calculated version angles following approximately linear functions. However, pelvic tilting to either side, leads, regarding the calculation of the inclination, to an average deviation between radiographic and calculated inclination angles less than 2 degrees .

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17216294     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-006-0167-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  20 in total

1.  The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation.

Authors:  F J Kummer; S Shah; S Iyer; P E DiCesare
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Hip-spine relationship: a radio-anatomical study for optimization in acetabular cup positioning.

Authors:  J-Y Lazennec; N Charlot; M Gorin; B Roger; N Arafati; A Bissery; G Saillant
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Variations of caudal, central, and cranial acetabular anteversion according to the tilt of the pelvis.

Authors:  S Zilber; J Y Lazennec; M Gorin; G Saillant
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Estimation of pelvic tilt on anteroposterior X-rays--a comparison of six parameters.

Authors:  M Tannast; S B Murphy; F Langlotz; S E Anderson; K A Siebenrock
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Radiographic calculation of anteversion in acetabular prostheses.

Authors:  D M Hassan; G H Johnston; W N Dust; L G Watson; D Cassidy
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Dislocations and the femoral head size in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  U Hedlundh; L Ahnfelt; C H Hybbinette; L Wallinder; J Weckström; H Fredin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation.

Authors:  D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-03

8.  Radiologic evaluation of the position of the acetabular component of the total hip prosthesis.

Authors:  H Pettersson; C F Gentz; H O Lindberg; A S Carlsson
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1982

9.  Measurements of pelvic flexion angle using three-dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Shunsaku Nishihara; Nobuhiko Sugano; Takashi Nishii; Kenji Ohzono; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  A new CT method for measuring cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 10 patients.

Authors:  Henrik Olivecrona; Lars Weidenhielm; Lotta Olivecrona; Mats O Beckman; André Stark; Marilyn E Noz; Gerald Q Maguire; Michael P Zeleznik; Lars Svensson; Torbjörn Jonson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-06
View more
  8 in total

1.  Accuracy and reliability of different methods to evaluate the acetabular cup version from plain radiographs.

Authors:  Maximilian Haenle; Wolfram Mittelmeier; Rodrigo Barbano; Klaus Wörtler; Roger Scholz; Rainer Bader
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Defining a reference range of acetabular inclination and center-edge angle of the hip in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Lucy A Fowkes; Elia Petridou; Christopher Zagorski; Amanjot Karuppiah; Andoni P Toms
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  A multimodal approach in total hip arthroplasty preoperative templating.

Authors:  Massimiliano Marcucci; Pier Francesco Indelli; Leonardo Latella; Paolo Poli; Devin King
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  [Painful hip arthroplasty: a diagnostic algorithm].

Authors:  M Hoberg; B M Holzapfel; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Assessment of inter- and intra-observer reliability in the determination of radiographic version and inclination of the cup in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Timo Puolakka; Antti Paakkala; Jorma Pajamäki
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Can pelvic tilting be ignored in total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Won Yong Shon; Vivek Sharma; Oh Jong Keon; Jun Gyu Moon; Dong Hun Suh
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-07-24

7.  The influence of patient factors on femoral rotation after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Taro Tezuka; Yutaka Inaba; Naomi Kobayashi; Hyonmin Choe; Syota Higashihira; Tomoyuki Saito
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Influence of Pelvic Tilt on Polyethylene Wear after Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Taro Tezuka; Yutaka Inaba; Naomi Kobayashi; Hiroyuki Ike; So Kubota; Masaki Kawamura; Tomoyuki Saito
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.