BACKGROUND: It is difficult to assess the orientation of the acetabular component on routine radiographs. We present a method for determining the spatial orientation of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using computed tomography. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two CT-scans, 10 min apart, were obtained from each of 10 patients after THA. Using locally developed software, two independent examiners measured the orientation of the acetabular component in relation to the pelvis. The measurements were repeated after one week. To be independent of the patient position during scanning, the method involved two steps. Firstly, a 3D volumetric image of the pelvis was brought into a standard pelvic orientation, then the orientation of the acetabular component was measured. The orientation of the acetabular component was expressed as operative anteversion and inclination relative to an internal pelvic reference coordinate system. To evaluate precision, we compared measurements across pairs of CT volumes between observers and trials. RESULTS: Mean absolute interobserver angle error was 2.3 degrees for anteversion (range 0-6.6 degrees), and 1.1 degrees for inclination (range 0-4.6 degrees). For interobserver measurements, the precision, defined as one standard deviation, was 2.9 degrees for anteversion, and 1.5 degrees for inclination. A Student's t-test showed that the overall differences between the examiners, trials, and cases were not significant. Data were normally distributed and were not dependent on examiner or trial. INTERPRETATION: We conclude that the implant angles of the acetabular component in relation to the pelvis could be detected repeatedly using CT, independently of patient positioning.
BACKGROUND: It is difficult to assess the orientation of the acetabular component on routine radiographs. We present a method for determining the spatial orientation of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using computed tomography. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two CT-scans, 10 min apart, were obtained from each of 10 patients after THA. Using locally developed software, two independent examiners measured the orientation of the acetabular component in relation to the pelvis. The measurements were repeated after one week. To be independent of the patient position during scanning, the method involved two steps. Firstly, a 3D volumetric image of the pelvis was brought into a standard pelvic orientation, then the orientation of the acetabular component was measured. The orientation of the acetabular component was expressed as operative anteversion and inclination relative to an internal pelvic reference coordinate system. To evaluate precision, we compared measurements across pairs of CT volumes between observers and trials. RESULTS: Mean absolute interobserver angle error was 2.3 degrees for anteversion (range 0-6.6 degrees), and 1.1 degrees for inclination (range 0-4.6 degrees). For interobserver measurements, the precision, defined as one standard deviation, was 2.9 degrees for anteversion, and 1.5 degrees for inclination. A Student's t-test showed that the overall differences between the examiners, trials, and cases were not significant. Data were normally distributed and were not dependent on examiner or trial. INTERPRETATION: We conclude that the implant angles of the acetabular component in relation to the pelvis could be detected repeatedly using CT, independently of patient positioning.
Authors: M Haenle; A Heitner; W Mittelmeier; R Barbano; R Scholz; E Steinhauser; R Bader Journal: Surg Radiol Anat Date: 2007-01-10 Impact factor: 1.246
Authors: Mohammad Ali Alzohiry; Mohammad Kamal Abdelnasser; Mohamed Moustafa; Mohamed Mahran; Hatem Bakr; Yaser Khalifa; Ahmed Abelaal; Haisam Atta; Galal Zaki Said Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Johannes Beckmann; Dirk Stengel; Markus Tingart; Jürgen Götz; Joachim Grifka; Christian Lüring Journal: Acta Orthop Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 3.717