Literature DB >> 12782869

Measurements of pelvic flexion angle using three-dimensional computed tomography.

Shunsaku Nishihara1, Nobuhiko Sugano, Takashi Nishii, Kenji Ohzono, Hideki Yoshikawa.   

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate whether safe acetabular component position depends on differences in pelvic location between the supine, standing, and sitting positions. The subjects of the current study were 101 patients who had total hip arthroplasty. Anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis with the patients in the supine, standing, and sitting positions were obtained preoperatively and 1 year after total hip arthroplasty. Computed tomography images of the pelvis were obtained preoperatively. Using image matching between the three-dimensional computed tomography model and anteroposterior radiograph, pelvic flexion angles with the patient in the supine, standing, and sitting positions were calculated. The mean preoperative pelvic flexion angle was 5 degrees +/- 9 degrees (range, -37 degrees -30 degrees ) in the supine position, 3 degrees +/- 12 degrees (range, -46 degrees -33 degrees ) in the standing position, and -29 degrees +/- 12 degrees (range, -62 degrees -10 degrees ) in the sitting position. Because there was much intersubject variability in pelvic flexion angle, it is not appropriate to determine orientation of the acetabular component from anatomic landmarks. In 90% of the cases, the difference in pelvic flexion angle between the supine and standing positions preoperatively was 10 degrees or less. In 90% of the cases, there was 20 degrees or greater extension of the pelvis from the supine position to the sitting position preoperatively, and the safe range of flexion of the hip from anterior prosthetic impingement in the sitting position was 20 degrees or greater than that in the supine position. Preoperative pelvic position in each case was almost completely maintained 1 year after total hip arthroplasty. It is reasonable to regard the pelvic position in the supine position as the functional pelvic position and proper pelvic reference frame in determining optimal orientation of the acetabular component in 90% of cases before and 1 year after total hip arthroplasty, although an adjustment of orientation of the acetabular component was needed for the remaining cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12782869     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000069891.31220.fd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  67 in total

1.  Improving cup positioning using a mechanical navigation instrument.

Authors:  Simon D Steppacher; Jens H Kowal; Stephen Barry Murphy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Accuracy and reliability of different methods to evaluate the acetabular cup version from plain radiographs.

Authors:  Maximilian Haenle; Wolfram Mittelmeier; Rodrigo Barbano; Klaus Wörtler; Roger Scholz; Rainer Bader
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Development of imageless computer navigation for acetabular component position in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Lawrence D Dorr; Yuji Hishiki; Zhinian Wan; Deanne Newton; Andrew Yun
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2005

4.  Assessment of cup position from plain radiographs: impact of pelvic tilting.

Authors:  M Haenle; A Heitner; W Mittelmeier; R Barbano; R Scholz; E Steinhauser; R Bader
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  [Size analysis and the reference area of acetabulum-prosthesis-transplantation in different body positions. ].

Authors:  Hui Zeng; Eckart Mayr; Bin Kang; Ao Xiong; Feng Xin; Michael Nogler; Martin Krismer
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2006

6.  Defining a reference range of acetabular inclination and center-edge angle of the hip in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Lucy A Fowkes; Elia Petridou; Christopher Zagorski; Amanjot Karuppiah; Andoni P Toms
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Six sigma analysis of minimally invasive acetabular arthroplasty: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  David A Heck; James B Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Validation of a simple radiographic method to determine variations in pelvic and acetabular cup sagittal plane alignment after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Won Yong Shon; Siddhartha Gupta; Sandeep Biswal; Chang Yong Hur; Nirmal Jajodia; Suk Joo Hong; Jae Sung Myung
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Toward a dynamic approach of THA planning based on ultrasound.

Authors:  Guillaume Dardenne; Stéphane Dusseau; Chafiaâ Hamitouche; Christian Lefèvre; Eric Stindel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Imaging and navigation measurement of acetabular component position in THA.

Authors:  Zhinian Wan; Aamer Malik; Branislav Jaramaz; Lisa Chao; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.