Literature DB >> 8444942

The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation.

D W Murray1.   

Abstract

The orientation of an acetabulum or an acetabular prosthesis may be described by its inclination and anteversion. Orientation can be assessed anatomically, radiographically, and by direct observation at operation. The angles of inclination and anteversion determined by these three methods differ because they have different spatial arrangements. There are therefore three distinct definitions of inclination and anteversion. This paper analyses the differences between the definitions and provides nomograms to convert from one to another. It is recommended that the operative definitions be used to describe the orientation of prostheses and that the anatomical definitions be used for dysplastic acetabula.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8444942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  253 in total

1.  [CT-free image guided acetabulum navigation in clinical routine].

Authors:  J Von Recum; K Wendl; J Korber; A Wentzensen; P A Grützner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Wear degradation of long-term in vivo exposed alumina-on-alumina hip joints: linking nanometer-scale phenomena to macroscopic joint design.

Authors:  Yasuhito Takahashi; Nobuhiko Sugano; Wenliang Zhu; Takashi Nishii; Takashi Sakai; Masaki Takao; Giuseppe Pezzotti
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Study of the three-dimensional orientation of the labrum: its relations with the osseous acetabular rim.

Authors:  Noémie Bonneau; July Bouhallier; Michel Baylac; Christine Tardieu; Olivier Gagey
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Measuring acetabular component version after THA: CT or plain radiograph?

Authors:  Benjamin McArthur; Michael Cross; Christina Geatrakas; David Mayman; Bernard Ghelman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Hip resurfacing revision rates: radiological audit of risk factors.

Authors:  I S Grewal; H A Kazi; M R Cope
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  A new method of measuring acetabular cup anteversion on simulated radiographs.

Authors:  Vikas Bachhal; Nipun Jindal; Gaurav Saini; Radheshyam Sament; Vishal Kumar; Devendra Chouhan; Mandeep Dhillon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Improving cup positioning using a mechanical navigation instrument.

Authors:  Simon D Steppacher; Jens H Kowal; Stephen Barry Murphy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position.

Authors:  Ernst Sendtner; Tibor Schuster; Michael Wörner; Thomas Kalteis; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Accuracy and reliability of different methods to evaluate the acetabular cup version from plain radiographs.

Authors:  Maximilian Haenle; Wolfram Mittelmeier; Rodrigo Barbano; Klaus Wörtler; Roger Scholz; Rainer Bader
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 1.246

10.  Analysis of acetabular version in the native hip: comparison between 2D axial CT and 3D CT measurements.

Authors:  Wael Dandachli; Saif Ul Islam; Richard Tippett; Margaret A Hall-Craggs; Johan D Witt
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.