Literature DB >> 21286713

Defining a reference range of acetabular inclination and center-edge angle of the hip in asymptomatic individuals.

Lucy A Fowkes1, Elia Petridou, Christopher Zagorski, Amanjot Karuppiah, Andoni P Toms.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Acetabular morphology is an important predictor of the severity of osteoarthrosis and survival of hip prostheses but there is limited data on the normal range of acetabular measurements on plain radiographs. The aim of this project was to determine the statistically normal ranges of acetabular inclination (AI) and center-edge angle (CEA).
METHOD: One hundred coronal CT localizers (50 men and 50 women aged 20-30 years) were included in this study. All the patients underwent CT examination for thoracic or intra-abdominal indications. Patients with pelvic disease, fractures, history of serious trauma, or previous pelvic surgery were excluded. One pair of independent observers measured the AI and pelvic tilt (PT), and a further pair measured the center-edge angle (CEA), using electronic calipers on a high-resolution PACS workstation.
RESULTS: AI and CEA measurements were obtained for 200 hips. There was very good intra-class correlation between the observers (r = 0.7-0.8). The mean AI was 38.8° (2SD 32.1-45.5°). That in men was 38.0° (2 SD 31.8-44.1°) and 39.6° (2 SD 32.7-46.8°) in women, which was statistically significantly different (p < 0.001). The mean CEA measurement for all patients was 36.3° (SD 13.8°), for men 37.7° (SD 10.8°) and for women 34.9° (SD 11.4°) with a statistically significant gender difference (p < 0.001). The mean pelvic tilt measurement (sacro-coccygeal-pubic symphysis) was 38.3 mm (2 SD 18.3-58.3 mm) with a significant gender difference (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study define reference ranges of two common measures of acetabular morphology and confirm statistically significant differences between men and women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21286713     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-011-1109-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  26 in total

1.  Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs.

Authors:  M Tannast; G Zheng; C Anderegg; K Burckhardt; F Langlotz; R Ganz; K A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate.

Authors:  Burkhard Lembeck; Otto Mueller; Patrik Reize; Nikolaus Wuelker
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  In vitro investigation of the influence of pelvic tilt on acetabular cup alignment.

Authors:  Thomas Andreas Kalteis; Martin Handel; Boris Herbst; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Estimation of pelvic tilt on anteroposterior X-rays--a comparison of six parameters.

Authors:  M Tannast; S B Murphy; F Langlotz; S E Anderson; K A Siebenrock
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Anatomic referencing of cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Ulrich Langlotz; Klaus-Arno Siebenrock; Matthias Wiese; Kai Bernsmann; Frank Langlotz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation.

Authors:  D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-03

7.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  A technique for measuring pelvic tilt.

Authors:  G Sanders; P Stavrakas
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1981-01

9.  Simulation of acetabular coverage of femoral head using anteroposterior pelvic radiographs.

Authors:  A Kojima; T Nakagawa; A Tohkura
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Femoral morphology differs between deficient and excessive acetabular coverage.

Authors:  S D Steppacher; M Tannast; S Werlen; K A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  8 in total

1.  Lateral center-edge angle on conventional radiography and computed tomography.

Authors:  Shafagh Monazzam; James D Bomar; Krishna Cidambi; Peter Kruk; Harish Hosalkar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Hip shape is symmetric, non-dependent on limb dominance and gender-specific: implications for femoroacetabular impingement. A 3D CT analysis in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Vasco V Mascarenhas; Paulo Rego; Pedro Dantas; Miguel Castro; Lennart Jans; Rui M Marques; Nélia Gouveia; Francisco Soldado; Olufemi R Ayeni; José G Consciência
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  What Are the Reference Values and Associated Factors for Center-edge Angle and Alpha Angle? A Population-based Study.

Authors:  Cornelius Sebastian Fischer; Jens-Peter Kühn; Till Ittermann; Carsten-Oliver Schmidt; Denis Gümbel; Richard Kasch; Matthias Frank; René Laqua; Peter Hinz; Jörn Lange
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Radiographic measurements of hip dysplasia at skeletal maturity--new reference intervals based on 2,038 19-year-old Norwegians.

Authors:  Lene Bjerke Laborie; Ingvild Øvstebø Engesæter; Trude Gundersen Lehmann; Francesco Sera; Carol Dezateux; Lars Birger Engesæter; Karen Rosendahl
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-01-27       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Can radiographic morphometric parameters for the hip be assessed on MRI?

Authors:  David Stelzeneder; Andreas Hingsammer; Sarah D Bixby; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Does femoral rotation influence anteroposterior alpha angle, lateral center-edge angle, and medial proximal femoral angle? A pilot study.

Authors:  Shafagh Monazzam; James D Bomar; Mandar Agashe; Harish S Hosalkar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Normal values of Wiberg's lateral center-edge angle and Lequesne's acetabular index--a coxometric update.

Authors:  Clément M L Werner; Leonhard E Ramseier; Thomas Ruckstuhl; Jeff Stromberg; Carol E Copeland; Clifford H Turen; Kaspar Rufibach; Samy Bouaicha
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Does hemipelvis structure and position influence acetabulum orientation?

Authors:  Bartosz Musielak; Marek Jóźwiak; Michał Rychlik; Brian Po-Jung Chen; Maciej Idzior; Andrzej Grzegorzewski
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.