Literature DB >> 20370023

Coherent reflection without traveling waves: on the origin of long-latency otoacoustic emissions in lizards.

Christopher Bergevin1, Christopher A Shera.   

Abstract

Lizard ears produce otoacoustic emissions with characteristics often strikingly reminiscent of those measured in mammals. The similarity of their emissions is surprising, given that lizards and mammals manifest major differences in aspects of inner ear morphology and function believed to be relevant to emission generation. For example, lizards such as the gecko evidently lack traveling waves along their basilar membrane. Despite the absence of traveling waves, the phase-gradient delays of gecko stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) are comparable to those measured in many mammals. This paper describes a model of emission generation inspired by the gecko inner ear. The model consists of an array of coupled harmonic oscillators whose effective damping manifests a small degree of irregularity. Model delays increase with the assumed sharpness of tuning, reflecting the build-up time associated with mechanical resonance. When tuning bandwidths are chosen to match those of gecko auditory-nerve fibers, the model reproduces the major features of gecko SFOAEs, including their spectral structure and the magnitude and frequency dependence of their phase-gradient delays. The same model with appropriately modified parameters reproduces the features of SFOAEs in alligator lizards. Analysis of the model demonstrates that the basic mechanisms operating in the model are similar to those of the coherent-reflection model developed to describe mammalian emissions. These results support the notion that SFOAE delays provide a noninvasive measure of the sharpness of cochlear tuning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20370023      PMCID: PMC2865438          DOI: 10.1121/1.3303977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  47 in total

1.  Modeling the combined effects of basilar membrane nonlinearity and roughness on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission fine structure.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; A Tubis; G R Long; C Tong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are amplitude-stabilized cochlear standing waves.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Sound-induced motions of individual cochlear hair bundles.

Authors:  A J Aranyosi; Dennis M Freeman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Otoacoustic estimation of cochlear tuning: validation in the chinchilla.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-05-04

6.  A scanning electron microscope study of the papilla basilaris of Gekko gecko.

Authors:  M R Miller
Journal:  Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat       Date:  1973

7.  Middle-ear characteristics of anesthetized cats.

Authors:  J J Guinan; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Low density of membrane particles in auditory hair cells of lizards and birds suggests an absence of somatic motility.

Authors:  Christine Köppl; Andrew Forge; Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  15 in total

1.  Tectorial membrane morphological variation: effects upon stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; David S Velenovsky; Kevin E Bonine
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Probing cochlear tuning and tonotopy in the tiger using otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Edward J Walsh; JoAnn McGee; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effects of air pressure on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions of lizards.

Authors:  Pim van Dijk; Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-09

5.  Otoacoustic estimation of cochlear tuning: validation in the chinchilla.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-05-04

6.  Frequency selectivity in Old-World monkeys corroborates sharp cochlear tuning in humans.

Authors:  Philip X Joris; Christopher Bergevin; Radha Kalluri; Myles Mc Laughlin; Pascal Michelet; Marcel van der Heijden; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Porosity controls spread of excitation in tectorial membrane traveling waves.

Authors:  Jonathan B Sellon; Roozbeh Ghaffari; Shirin Farrahi; Guy P Richardson; Dennis M Freeman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Longitudinal spread of mechanical excitation through tectorial membrane traveling waves.

Authors:  Jonathan B Sellon; Shirin Farrahi; Roozbeh Ghaffari; Dennis M Freeman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Comparison of time-frequency methods for analyzing stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Milan Biswal; Srikanta K Mishra
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission reflection-component delays and cochlear tuning: estimates from across the human lifespan.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; François Guérit; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.