Literature DB >> 23862813

Measuring stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions using swept tones.

Radha Kalluri1, Christopher A Shera.   

Abstract

Although stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) offer compelling advantages as noninvasive probes of cochlear function, they remain underutilized compared to other evoked emission types, such as distortion-products (DPOAEs), whose measurement methods are less complex and time-consuming. Motivated by similar advances in the measurement of DPOAEs, this paper develops and characterizes a more efficient SFOAE measurement paradigm based on swept tones. In contrast to standard SFOAE measurement methods, in which the emissions are measured in the sinusoidal steady-state using discrete tones of well defined frequency, the swept-tone method sweeps rapidly across frequency (typically at rates of 1 Hz/ms or greater) using a chirp-like stimulus. Measurements obtained using both swept- and discrete-tone methods in an interleaved suppression paradigm demonstrate that the two methods of measuring SFOAEs yield nearly equivalent results, the differences between them being comparable to the run-to-run variability encountered using either method alone. The match appears robust to variations in measurement parameters, such as sweep rate and direction. The near equivalence of the SFOAEs obtained using the two measurement methods enables the interpretation of swept-tone SFOAEs within existing theoretical frameworks. Furthermore, the data demonstrate that SFOAE phase-gradient delays-including their large and irregular fluctuations across frequency-reflect actual physical time delays at different frequencies, showing that the physical emission latency, not merely the phase gradient, is inherently irregular.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23862813      PMCID: PMC3732205          DOI: 10.1121/1.4807505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions in the Northern leopard frog, Rana pipiens pipiens: implications for inner ear mechanics.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Coherent reflection in a two-dimensional cochlea: Short-wave versus long-wave scattering in the generation of reflection-source otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Arnold Tubis; Carrick L Talmadge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Near equivalence of human click-evoked and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Radha Kalluri; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Cochlear reflectivity in transmission-line models and otoacoustic emission characteristic time delays.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Comparing stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured by compression, suppression, and spectral smoothing.

Authors:  Radha Kalluri; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions using continuously sweeping primaries.

Authors:  Glenis R Long; Carrick L Talmadge; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Otoacoustic estimation of cochlear tuning: validation in the chinchilla.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-05-04

10.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission: measurements in humans and simulations with an active cochlear model.

Authors:  Yong-Sun Choi; Soo-Young Lee; Kourosh Parham; Stephen T Neely; Duck O Kim
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  32 in total

1.  Optimizing swept-tone protocols for recording distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults and newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  High frequency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission measurements using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Chelsea M Blankenship; Angela C Garinis; Daniel B Putterman; Marcin Wróblewski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Chirp-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and Middle Ear Absorbance for Monitoring Ototoxicity in Cystic Fibrosis Patients.

Authors:  Angela C Garinis; Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Daniel B Putterman; Garnett P McMillan; Jeffrey A Gold; M Patrick Feeney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Otoacoustic-emission-based medial-olivocochlear reflex assays for humans.

Authors:  Lynne Marshall; Judi A Lapsley Miller; John J Guinan; Christopher A Shera; Charlotte M Reed; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne; Paul Boege
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The spiral staircase: tonotopic microstructure and cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Comparisons of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.

Authors:  Daniel B Putterman; Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; Angela C Garinis; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Garnett P McMillan; M Patrick Feeney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Differentiating Middle Ear and Medial Olivocochlear Effects on Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Kendra L Marks; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-21

10.  Exploiting Dual Otoacoustic Emission Sources.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.