Literature DB >> 23982894

Medial olivocochlear-induced transient-evoked otoacoustic emission amplitude shifts in individual subjects.

Shawn S Goodman1, Ian B Mertes, James D Lewis, Diana K Weissbeck.   

Abstract

Activation of the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) can be assessed indirectly using transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs). The change in TEOAE amplitudes when the MOCR is activated (medial olivocochlear (MOC) shift) has most often been quantified as the mean value in groups of subjects. The usefulness of MOC shift measurements may be increased by the ability to quantify significant shifts in individuals. This study used statistical resampling to quantify significant MOC shifts in 16 subjects. TEOAEs were obtained using transient stimuli containing energy from 1 to 10 kHz. A nonlinear paradigm was used to extract TEOAEs. Transient stimuli were presented at 30 dB sensation level (SL) with suppressor stimuli presented 12 dB higher. Contralateral white noise, used to activate the MOCR, was presented at 30 dB SL and was interleaved on and off in 30-s intervals during a 7-min recording period. Confounding factors of middle ear muscle reflex and slow amplitude drifts were accounted for. TEOAEs were analyzed in 11 1/3-octave frequency bands. The statistical significance of each individual MOC shift was determined using a bootstrap procedure. The minimum detectable MOC shifts ranged from 0.10 to 3.25 dB and were highly dependent on signal-to-noise ratio at each frequency. Subjects exhibited a wide range of magnitudes of significant MOC shifts in the 1.0-3.2-kHz region (median = 1.94 dB, range = 0.34-6.51 dB). There was considerable overlap between the magnitudes of significant and nonsignificant shifts. While most subjects had significant MOC shifts in one or more frequency bands below 4 kHz, few had significant shifts in all of these bands. Above 4 kHz, few significant shifts were seen, but this may have been due to lower signal-to-noise ratios. The specific frequency bands containing significant shifts were variable across individuals. Further work is needed to determine the clinical usefulness of examining MOC shifts in individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23982894      PMCID: PMC3825019          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-013-0409-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  29 in total

Review 1.  The active cochlea.

Authors:  P Dallos
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Effects of the crossed acoustic reflex on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in awake rabbits.

Authors:  M L Whitehead; G K Martin; B L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Involvement of the olivocochlear bundle in the detection of tones in noise.

Authors:  C Micheyl; L Collet
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans: intensity effects.

Authors:  L J Hood; C I Berlin; A Hurley; R P Cecola; B Bell
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Time-frequency distributions of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  G Tognola; F Grandori; P Ravazzani
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects.

Authors:  L Collet; D T Kemp; E Veuillet; R Duclaux; A Moulin; A Morgon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.

Authors:  E Veuillet; L Collet; R Duclaux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  C I Berlin; L J Hood; H Wen; P Szabo; R P Cecola; P Rigby; D F Jackson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Reduced medial olivocochlear bundle system function in children with auditory processing disorders.

Authors:  Chava Muchnik; Daphne Ari-Even Roth; Rima Othman-Jebara; Hanna Putter-Katz; Esther L Shabtai; Minka Hildesheimer
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.854

View more
  25 in total

1.  Otoacoustic-emission-based medial-olivocochlear reflex assays for humans.

Authors:  Lynne Marshall; Judi A Lapsley Miller; John J Guinan; Christopher A Shera; Charlotte M Reed; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne; Paul Boege
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Stability of the medial olivocochlear reflex as measured by distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Exploring the Role of Medial Olivocochlear Efferents on the Detection of Amplitude Modulation for Tones Presented in Noise.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Alix M Klang; Nathan T Torunsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-28

4.  Synchronized Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions Provide a Signal-to-Noise Ratio Advantage in Medial-Olivocochlear Reflex Assays.

Authors:  James D Lewis
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-13

Review 5.  Olivocochlear efferents: Their action, effects, measurement and uses, and the impact of the new conception of cochlear mechanical responses.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  No effects of attention or visual perceptual load on cochlear function, as measured with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Efferent-induced alterations in distortion and reflection otoacoustic emissions in children.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Milan Biswal; Anup Amatya
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Efferent inhibition strength is a physiological correlate of hyperacusis in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Uzma S Wilson; Kate M Sadler; Kenneth E Hancock; John J Guinan; Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Examining replicability of an otoacoustic measure of cochlear function during selective attention.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Differentiating Middle Ear and Medial Olivocochlear Effects on Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Kendra L Marks; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.