Literature DB >> 19275317

Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions to investigate efferent and cochlear contributions to temporal overshoot.

Douglas H Keefe1, Kim S Schairer, John C Ellison, Denis F Fitzpatrick, Walt Jesteadt.   

Abstract

Behavioral threshold for a tone burst presented in a long-duration noise masker decreases as the onset of the tone burst is delayed relative to masker onset. The threshold difference between detection of early- and late-onset tone bursts is called overshoot. Although the underlying mechanisms are unclear, one hypothesis is that overshoot occurs due to efferent suppression of cochlear nonlinearity [von Klitzing, R., and Kohlrausch, A. (1994). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 2192-2201]. This hypothesis was tested by using overshoot conditions to elicit stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs), which provide a physiological measure of cochlear nonlinearity. SFOAE and behavioral thresholds were estimated using a modified maximum-likelihood yes-no procedure. The masker was a 400-ms "frozen" notched noise. The signal was a 20-ms, 4-kHz tone burst presented at 1 or 200 ms after the noise onset. Behavioral overshoot results replicated previous studies, but no overshoot was observed in SFOAE thresholds. This suggests that either efferent suppression of cochlear nonlinearity is not involved in overshoot, or a SFOAE threshold estimation procedure based on stimuli similar to those used to study behavioral overshoot is not sensitive enough to measure the effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19275317      PMCID: PMC2677284          DOI: 10.1121/1.3068443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  43 in total

1.  Enhancements of the edges of temporal masking functions by complex patterns of overshoot and undershoot.

Authors:  C Formby; L P Sherlock; S H Ferguson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Experience with a yes-no single-interval maximum-likelihood procedure.

Authors:  M R Leek; J R Dubno; N He; J B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Psychophysical correlates of contralateral efferent suppression. I. The role of the medial olivocochlear system in "central masking" in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  D W Smith; D A Turner; M M Henson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of ipsilateral and contralateral precursors on overshoot.

Authors:  S P Bacon; L Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Cholinergic modulation of stellate cells in the mammalian ventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  K Fujino; D Oertel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The relationship between frequency selectivity and overshoot.

Authors:  E A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Input-output functions for stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adult ears.

Authors:  Kim S Schairer; Denis Fitzpatrick; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Reductions in overshoot during aspirin use.

Authors:  D McFadden; C A Champlin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Auditory sensori-neural alterations induced by salicylate.

Authors:  Y Cazals
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  19 in total

1.  The time course of cochlear gain reduction measured using a more efficient psychophysical technique.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Overshoot using very short signal delays.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Erin M Grenwelge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comparing behavioral and physiological measures of combination tones: sex and race differences.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle D Hsieh; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Detecting high-frequency hearing loss with click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Shawn S Goodman; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Properties of a nonlinear version of the stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Changes in otoacoustic emissions during selective auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Exploring the role of feedback-based auditory reflexes in forward masking by schroeder-phase complexes.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-22

8.  Exploring the Role of Medial Olivocochlear Efferents on the Detection of Amplitude Modulation for Tones Presented in Noise.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Alix M Klang; Nathan T Torunsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-28

9.  Psychoacoustic measurements of ipsilateral cochlear gain reduction as a function of signal frequency.

Authors:  Kristina DeRoy Milvae; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Wideband acoustic-reflex test in a test battery to predict middle-ear dysfunction.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Denis Fitzpatrick; Yi-Wen Liu; Chris A Sanford; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.