Literature DB >> 20712989

Tectorial membrane morphological variation: effects upon stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Christopher Bergevin1, David S Velenovsky, Kevin E Bonine.   

Abstract

The tectorial membrane (TM) is widely believed to play an important role in determining the ear's ability to detect and resolve incoming acoustic information. While it is still unclear precisely what that role is, the TM has been hypothesized to help overcome viscous forces and thereby sharpen mechanical tuning of the sensory cells. Lizards present a unique opportunity to further study the role of the TM given the diverse inner-ear morphological differences across species. Furthermore, stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs), sounds emitted by the ear in response to a tone, noninvasively probe the frequency selectivity of the ear. We report estimates of auditory tuning derived from SFOAEs for 12 different species of lizards with widely varying TM morphology. Despite gross anatomical differences across the species examined herein, low-level SFOAEs were readily measurable in all ears tested, even in non-TM species whose basilar papilla contained as few as 50-60 hair cells. Our measurements generally support theoretical predictions: longer delays/sharper tuning features are found in species with a TM relative to those without. However, SFOAEs from at least one non-TM species (Anolis) with long delays suggest there are likely additional micromechanical factors at play that can directly affect tuning. Additionally, in the one species examined with a continuous TM (Aspidoscelis) where cell-to-cell coupling is presumably relatively stronger, delays were intermediate. This observation appears consistent with recent reports that suggest the TM may play a more complex macromechanical role in the mammalian cochlea via longitudinal energy distribution (and thereby affect tuning). Although significant differences exist between reptilian and mammalian auditory biophysics, understanding lizard OAE generation mechanisms yields significant insight into fundamental principles at work in all vertebrate ears. 2010 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20712989      PMCID: PMC2920662          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  54 in total

1.  Coherent reflection without traveling waves: on the origin of long-latency otoacoustic emissions in lizards.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Col11a2 deletion reveals the molecular basis for tectorial membrane mechanical anisotropy.

Authors:  Kinuko Masaki; Jianwen Wendy Gu; Roozbeh Ghaffari; Gary Chan; Richard J H Smith; Dennis M Freeman; A J Aranyosi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Anolis lizards.

Authors:  Jonathan B Losos; Christopher J Schneider
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Frequency clustering in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions from a lizard's ear.

Authors:  Andrej Vilfan; Thomas Duke
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Correlated movement of hair bundles coupled to the otolithic membrane in the bullfrog sacculus.

Authors:  C E Strimbu; D Ramunno-Johnson; L Fredrickson; K Arisaka; D Bozovic
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Frequency-dependent shear impedance of the tectorial membrane.

Authors:  Jianwen Wendy Gu; Werner Hemmert; Dennis M Freeman; A J Aranyosi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Effects of salicylates and aminoglycosides on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the Tokay gecko.

Authors:  C E Stewart; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Laryngotracheal morphology of Afro-Madagascan geckos: a comparative survey.

Authors:  A P Russell; D R Rittenhouse; A M Bauer
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.804

9.  Otoacoustic emissions in humans, birds, lizards, and frogs: evidence for multiple generation mechanisms.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Dennis M Freeman; James C Saunders; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Enhancement of sensitivity gain and frequency tuning by coupling of active hair bundles.

Authors:  Kai Dierkes; Benjamin Lindner; Frank Jülicher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  6 in total

1.  Probing cochlear tuning and tonotopy in the tiger using otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Edward J Walsh; JoAnn McGee; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Measuring stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions using swept tones.

Authors:  Radha Kalluri; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparison of otoacoustic emissions within gecko subfamilies: morphological implications for auditory function in lizards.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-07

5.  Salient features of otoacoustic emissions are common across tetrapod groups and suggest shared properties of generation mechanisms.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Geoffrey A Manley; Christine Köppl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Loss of the tectorial membrane protein CEACAM16 enhances spontaneous, stimulus-frequency, and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Mary Ann Cheatham; Richard J Goodyear; Kazuaki Homma; P Kevin Legan; Julia Korchagina; Souvik Naskar; Jonathan H Siegel; Peter Dallos; Jing Zheng; Guy P Richardson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.