Literature DB >> 14736765

Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness.

S Miglior1, E Albe, M Guareschi, G Mandelli, S Gomarasca, N Orzalesi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess reproducibility of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurement by means of ultrasonic pachymetry.
METHODS: Fifty one volunteers underwent three sessions of CCT measurements, each consisting of three CCT measurements, performed by each of three different observers. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility was calculated by means of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The expected range of variability between two independent evaluations was calculated using scatter plots of each test-retest difference against their mean. The standard deviation of the mean differences in the test-retest scores was used to describe the differences in the score spread.
RESULTS: The ICC ranges of the intra- and interobserver evaluations were 0.95-0.97 and 0.89-0.95 respectively; the expected variability was < or = +/-1% and < or = +/- 2% respectively (95% confidence interval).
CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of CCT by means of ultrasonic pachymetry is highly reproducible.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14736765      PMCID: PMC1772014          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2003.023416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  41 in total

1.  Orbscan pachymetry: implications of a repeated measures and diurnal variation analysis.

Authors:  M R Lattimore; S Kaupp; S Schallhorn; R Lewis
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  THE VALIDITY OF THE IMBERT-FLICK LAW AS APPLIED TO APPLANATION TONOMETRY.

Authors:  J GLOSTER; E S PERKINS
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 3.467

3.  [Applanation tonometry].

Authors:  H GOLDMANN; T SCHMIDT
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1957-10       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  Corneal thickness measurements with the Orbscan Topography System and ultrasonic pachymetry.

Authors:  V Yaylali; S C Kaufman; H W Thompson
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  R C Wolfs; C C Klaver; J R Vingerling; D E Grobbee; A Hofman; P T de Jong
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Corneal thickness in ocular hypertension, primary open-angle glaucoma, and normal tension glaucoma.

Authors:  R P Copt; R Thomas; A Mermoud
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-01

7.  Falsely elevated intraocular pressure due to increased central corneal thickness.

Authors:  A M Bron; C Creuzot-Garcher; S Goudeau-Boutillon; P d'Athis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Incidence of open-angle glaucoma: the Barbados Eye Studies. The Barbados Eye Studies Group.

Authors:  M C Leske; A M Connell; S Y Wu; B Nemesure; X Li; A Schachat; A Hennis
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-01

9.  Ocular hypertension and central corneal thickness.

Authors:  W A Argus
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Applanation tonometry and correction according to corneal thickness.

Authors:  R Stodtmeister
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  1998-06
View more
  40 in total

1.  Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by oculus pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry.

Authors:  Hani S Al-Mezaine; Saleh A Al-Amro; Dustan Kangave; Abdulkareem Sadaawy; Taher A Wehaib; Saleh Al-Obeidan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Measurements of anterior segment parameters using three different non-contact optical devices in keratoconus patients.

Authors:  Ahmet Taylan Yazıcı; Gökhan Pekel; Ercüment Bozkurt; Yusuf Yıldırım; Evre Pekel; Ahmet Demirok; Omer Faruk Yılmaz
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Circadian variations in central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  P Fogagnolo; L Rossetti; F Mazzolani; N Orzalesi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Central corneal thickness determination in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, a Scheimpflug camera, and anterior segment OCT.

Authors:  David Kuerten; Niklas Plange; Eva Charlotte Koch; Antonis Koutsonas; Peter Walter; Matthias Fuest
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Comparison of corneal measurements in keratoconic eyes using rotating Scheimpflug camera and scanning-slit topography.

Authors:  Mohammad Naderan; Saeed Shoar; Morteza Naderan; Mohammad Amin Kamaleddin; Mohammad Taher Rajabi
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Effects of 5% sodium chloride ophthalmic ointment on thickness and morphology of the normal canine cornea.

Authors:  Michelle Samuel; Sara M Thomasy; Allison S Calderon; Philip H Kass; Keith Collins; Christopher J Murphy
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 1.644

7.  Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements obtained by community optometrists to those obtained in secondary care.

Authors:  Laura Hughes; Cheng Yi Loo; Brian Hogan; Huai Ling Tan; Ling Shan Tang; Andrew J Tatham
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Effect of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome on corneal thickness.

Authors:  Handan Inonu Koseoglu; Asiye Kanbay; Huseyin Ortak; Remzi Karadağ; Osman Demir; Selim Demir; Alper Gunes; Sibel Doruk
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  The effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurement in patients with corneal pathology.

Authors:  A C Browning; A Bhan; A P Rotchford; S Shah; H S Dua
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and ultrasound pachymetry.

Authors:  Jeevan S Ladi; Nitant A Shah
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.