Literature DB >> 10328399

Orbscan pachymetry: implications of a repeated measures and diurnal variation analysis.

M R Lattimore1, S Kaupp, S Schallhorn, R Lewis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Corneal thickness changes reflect alterations in hydration and metabolism. Ultrasound pachymetry determinations may be adversely influenced by fluctuations in tissue hydration, whereas optical systems are apparently unaffected by these fluxes. A recently marketed, optical-based, topographic mapping system (Orbscan; Orbtek, Inc.) uses anterior and posterior corneal surface data to calculate corneal thickness.
OBJECTIVE: This new instrumentation presents as a potentially useful pachymetry tool for evaluation of corneas under hydration flux or challenge (e.g., postphotorefractive keratectomy [PRK] healing studies) and was therefore evaluated for accuracy and variability. MEASUREMENTS: Three calibrated standards were measured in repeated fashion. Additionally, 1 test subject was measured 30 times in 1 day (5 measurements each at 8:00, 9:30, and 11:00 AM and at 1:00, 2:30, and 4:00 PM). Corresponding measurements were made at 8:00 and 11:00 AM and at 4:00 PM on 3 separate days to assess repeatability. Grouped data from 18 volunteer subjects were compared to the data of the test subject as well.
RESULTS: Pachymetry accuracy on a calibrated standard was determined to be +/-2 microm (standard deviation, n = 12). Repeated measures on the subject demonstrated a mean standard deviation of 9.08 microm for 750 thickness data points across the central 7 mm of the cornea; peripheral measurement points exhibited progressively greater variability than at the apex (analysis of variance; P<0.0001). A plot of thickness by corneal location and time of day exhibited a diurnal pattern, with the peripheral cornea exhibiting progressively greater thickness changes than the central cornea (two-way analysis of variance; P<0.00001). The data significantly correlated across days when all times of day were considered (r = 0.999). However, thickness values obtained at 8:00 AM were significantly different across days (t test; P<0.0002). The subject's data correlated very well (r = 0.9996) with the grouped volunteer data.
CONCLUSIONS: These data show this system to be useful in corneal research and in clinical settings. The data confirm early morning pachymetry to be highly variable. Additionally, the data not only indicate a diurnal variation of corneal hydration over time, but also imply the presence of a diurnal-based hydration gradient across the peripheral cornea, both of which can have significance for PRK, since excimer tissue ablation effectiveness is influenced by tissue hydration.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10328399     DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00519-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  20 in total

1.  Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness.

Authors:  S Miglior; E Albe; M Guareschi; G Mandelli; S Gomarasca; N Orzalesi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, non-contact specular microscopy, and ultrasonic pachymetry in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  K Kawana; T Tokunaga; K Miyata; F Okamoto; T Kiuchi; T Oshika
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  The effects of corneal parameters on the assessment of endothelial cell density in the elderly eye.

Authors:  A Müller; J P Craig; C N Grupcheva; C N J McGhee
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements obtained by community optometrists to those obtained in secondary care.

Authors:  Laura Hughes; Cheng Yi Loo; Brian Hogan; Huai Ling Tan; Ling Shan Tang; Andrew J Tatham
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Repeatability of central corneal thickness measurements measured with the Topcon SP2000P specular microscope.

Authors:  Kelechi C Ogbuehi; Turki M Almubrad
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  The preoperative intraocular pressure level predicts the amount of underestimated intraocular pressure after LASIK for myopia.

Authors:  E Chihara; H Takahashi; K Okazaki; M Park; M Tanito
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Eye rubbing-induced changes in intraocular pressure and corneal thickness measured at five locations, in subjects with ocular allergy.

Authors:  Uchechukwu L Osuagwu; Saud A Alanazi
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Differences in ocular dimensions between normal and dry eyes.

Authors:  Juan A Sanchis-Gimeno; Manuel Herrera; Franzisco Sánchez-del-Campo; Francisco Martínez-Soriano
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of Artemis-2 high-frequency ultrasound in determination of human corneal thickness.

Authors:  Kelechi C Ogbuehi; Uchechukwu L Osuagwu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05-21

10.  Central Corneal Thickness Measurement by Ultrasound versus Orbscan II.

Authors:  Amir Faramarzi; Hossein Ziai
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2008-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.