Literature DB >> 30038312

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements obtained by community optometrists to those obtained in secondary care.

Laura Hughes1, Cheng Yi Loo2, Brian Hogan2, Huai Ling Tan2, Ling Shan Tang2, Andrew J Tatham3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Corneal central thickness (CCT) is an important risk factor for glaucoma, which also influences intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements. Recently, all community optometrists in Scotland were provided with pachymeters. This study examined the accuracy of CCT measured by community optometrists compared to measurements in the glaucoma clinic.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients referred to the glaucoma clinic at a university hospital between June and November 2016. 142 of 715 (19.9%) patients had CCT measurements included in the referral, all of whom had repeat measurements in the glaucoma clinic. CCT was measured using the PachPen (Accutome Inc) which generates a CCT reading by automatically taking the average of up to 9 measurements. Measurements were compared using Bland-Altman analysis.
RESULTS: CCT measured by community optometrists was slightly thicker than CCT in the glaucoma clinic (558.3 ± 41.5 vs. 552.6 ± 58.8 µm, P < 0.001), however the mean difference was only 13.8 ± 18.0 µm. In 223 of 284 eyes (78.5%), CCT measurements taken by community optometrists were within 20 µm of those obtained in the glaucoma clinic. 61 of 284 (21.5%) differed by >20 µm, 40 (14.1%) by >30 µm and 17 (6.0%) by >50 µm. There was no significant relationship between difference in CCT and IOP (-0.02, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.002, P = 0.077), gender (0.00, 95%CI -0.01 to 0.01, P = 0.805), or age (-0.01, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.06, P = 0.791).
CONCLUSIONS: There was good overall agreement between CCT measured by community optometrists and measurements obtained in the glaucoma clinic. The tendency for thicker CCT measurements by community optometrists may be due to more peripheral or non-perpendicular positioning of the pachymeter relative to the cornea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30038312      PMCID: PMC6224573          DOI: 10.1038/s41433-018-0169-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  27 in total

1.  The repeatability of corneal thickness measures.

Authors:  M W Marsich; M A Bullimore
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal thickness measurements by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Sarah Muscat; Nicola McKay; Stuart Parks; Ewan Kemp; David Keating
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  A national survey of the use of pachymeters by optometrists in Scotland: experience, views and barriers to use.

Authors:  Colin Goudie; Savva Pronin; Helen Court; Janet Pooley; Andrew J Tatham
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Comparison of the corneal effects of latanoprost, fixed combination latanoprost-timolol, and timolol: A double-masked, randomized, one-year study.

Authors:  J H Lass; G L Eriksson; L Osterling; C V Simpson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Causes of blind and partial sight certifications in England and Wales: April 2007-March 2008.

Authors:  C Bunce; W Xing; R Wormald
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Stromal lactate accumulation can account for corneal oedema osmotically following epithelial hypoxia in the rabbit.

Authors:  S D Klyce
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Effect of alpha- and beta-receptor active drugs on corneal thickness.

Authors:  C B Nielsen; P J Nielsen
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1985-06

8.  Central corneal thickness in Latinos.

Authors:  Sora Hahn; Stanley Azen; Mei Ying-Lai; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in healthy eyes using four different optical devices.

Authors:  Remzi Karadag; Murat Unluzeybek; Ozgur Cakici; Ayse Yagmur Kanra; Huseyin Bayramlar
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  Age-related changes in corneal thickness and endothelial characteristics.

Authors:  Saulius Galgauskas; Dovilė Norvydaitė; Dalia Krasauskaitė; Simona Stech; Rimvydas Stanislovas Ašoklis
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.