Literature DB >> 25896108

Central corneal thickness determination in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, a Scheimpflug camera, and anterior segment OCT.

David Kuerten1, Niklas Plange, Eva Charlotte Koch, Antonis Koutsonas, Peter Walter, Matthias Fuest.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of post-surgical corneal edema on the reliability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements by a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam), ultrasound pachymetry (USP), and anterior-segment spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT).
METHODS: Thirty-two patients planned for cataract surgery (n = 16) or vitrectomy (n =  6) were included in a prospective study. The non-surgery eye was used as control. Two investigators acquired two measurements each, with the Pentacam (Oculus, Germany) and the AS-OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany) in a randomized order, followed by USP (Tomey SP-100, Germany). CCT was evaluated using the apex value for Pentacam, the corneal apex cut in AS-OCT and averaging eight single measurements for USP. Coefficients of variation (COV) and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were determined.
RESULTS: Post-surgery corneas showed a thickness of (investigators 1 and 2): Pentacam (615.9 ± 58.02 μm and 615.1 ± 60.17 μm), USP (601.4 ± 63.77 μm and 614.5 ± 70.91 μm), AS-OCT (608.8 ± 65.67 μm and 606.9 ± 64.41 μm) ,with no significant difference (ANOVA p > 0.99). The COVs (investigators 1 and 2) for control eyes were: Pentacam (0.78 ± 0.52 and 0.70 ± 0.76), USP (0.66 ± 0.29 and 0.98 ± 0.44), AS-OCT (0.59 ± 0.61 and 0.59 ± 0.40). The COVs (investigators 1 and 2) for post-surgical eyes were: Pentacam (0.98 ± 1.25 and 0.97 ± 0.73), USP (0.73 ± 0.64 and 1.35 ± 0.85), AS-OCT (1.34 ± 1.57 and 1.19 ± 1.18).The ICC was determined in post-surgery corneas (ICC > 0.96) and control corneas (ICC > 0.95).
CONCLUSION: USP measurements have the highest user dependence. Post-surgical corneal edema leads to higher intraobserver variability. All methods reached a high level of agreement in CCT determination in edematous as well as healthy corneas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25896108     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-015-2998-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  28 in total

1.  Reliability coefficients of three corneal pachymeters.

Authors:  N C Wheeler; C M Morantes; R M Kristensen; T H Pettit; D A Lee
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  High-frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy versus ultrasound and optical pachymetry for the measurement of corneal thickness.

Authors:  L Pierro; E Conforto; A G Resti; R Lattanzio
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.250

3.  Central corneal pachymetry in patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  F W Price; D L Koller; M O Price
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Differences in central corneal thickness between the paired eyes and the severity of the glaucomatous damage.

Authors:  M Iester; S Telani; P Frezzotti; G Manni; M Uva; M Figus; A Perdicchi
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Contact lens-induced corneal peripheral swelling differences with extended wear.

Authors:  Raul Martin; Victoria de Juan; Guadalupe Rodriguez; Soraya Fonseca; Sofia Martin
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.

Authors:  Aachal Kotecha; David P Crabb; Alexander Spratt; David F Garway-Heath
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Measurement of corneal swelling variations without removal of the contact lens during extended wear.

Authors:  Raul Martin; Victoria de Juan; Guadalupe Rodríguez; Ruben Cuadrado; Itziar Fernandez
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in keratoconus using the rotating Scheimpflug camera and ultrasound pachymetry.

Authors:  Ugo de Sanctis; Alessandro Missolungi; Bernardo Mutani; Lorenzo Richiardi; Federico M Grignolo
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measurement by Sirius(®) Scheimpflug tomography and ultrasound.

Authors:  J Jorge; Jl Rosado; Ja Díaz-Rey; Jm González-Méijome
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-26

10.  Measuring Corneal Thickness with SOCT, the Scheimpflug System, and Ultrasound Pachymetry.

Authors:  Ilona Piotrowiak; Beata Soldanska; Mateusz Burduk; Bartlomiej J Kaluzny; Jozef Kaluzny
Journal:  ISRN Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-02
View more
  9 in total

1.  Central corneal thickness determination in corneal edema.

Authors:  Nicola Rosa; Maddalena De Bernardo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Comparison of specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry before and after cataract surgery.

Authors:  Alberto López-Miguel; María Sanchidrián; Itziar Fernández; Alfredo Holgueras; Miguel J Maldonado
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Monitoring of central corneal thickness after phacoemulsification-comparison of statical and rotating Scheimpflug pachymetry, and spectral-domain OCT.

Authors:  Daniel M Handzel; Carsten H Meyer; Alfred Wegener
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 1.645

4.  No differences in central corneal thickness between open-angle and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Marcelo Ayala; Johanna Karlsson
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-19

5.  Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, Visante anterior-segment optical coherence tomography, Cirrus optical coherence tomography, and Pentacam Scheimpflug camera tomography.

Authors:  Nida Wongchaisuwat; Ankana Metheetrairat; Pratuangsri Chonpimai; Waree Nujoi; Pinnita Prabhasawat
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-25

6.  Thickness changes in the corneal epithelium and Bowman's layer after overnight wear of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

Authors:  Fan Lu; Aizhu Tao; Weiwei Tao; Xiran Zhuang; Meixiao Shen
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Accuracy of Cirrus HD-OCT and Topcon SP-3000P for measuring central corneal thickness.

Authors:  Jorge A Calvo-Sanz; Javier Ruiz-Alcocer; Miguel A Sánchez-Tena
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2017-02-21

8.  Comparison of Six Methods of Central Corneal Thickness Measurement in Healthy Eyes.

Authors:  Turgay Ucak; Erel Icel; Nurdan Gamze Tasli; Yucel Karakurt; Hayati Yilmaz; Adem Ugurlu; Mehmet Demir
Journal:  Beyoglu Eye J       Date:  2021-02-12

9.  Effects of Central Corneal Stromal Thickness and Epithelial Thickness on Intraocular Pressure Using Goldmann Applanation and Non-Contact Tonometers.

Authors:  Marvin Lee; Jaehong Ahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.