Literature DB >> 9686845

Applanation tonometry and correction according to corneal thickness.

R Stodtmeister1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In previous studies, it has been shown that the central corneal thickness influences the measurement values of applanation tonometry. The aim of this study is to answer the question as to which values and with what frequency the tonometer readings as based on corneal thickness have to be corrected in the patients attending an ophthalmic practice. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The corneal thickness was measured in 579 patients using ultrasound pachymetry under the conditions prevailing in a medical practice; from the thickness obtained, the correction values for intraocular pressure were calculated.
RESULTS: Correction values of +/-2 mm Hg and above were found in half of the patients examined, and correction values of +/-3 mm Hg and above in a good quarter of the patients. The correction value was +/-4 mm Hg and more in every fifth patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Corneal thickness does, in fact, influence the results of applanation tonometry to a clinically relevant degree.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9686845     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760313.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand        ISSN: 1395-3907


  45 in total

1.  Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings.

Authors:  N Feltgen; D Leifert; J Funk
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness.

Authors:  S Miglior; E Albe; M Guareschi; G Mandelli; S Gomarasca; N Orzalesi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Is there any association between primary hyperparathyroidism and ocular changes, such as central corneal thickness, retinal thickness, and intraocular pressure?

Authors:  Husniye Baser; Neslihan Cuhaci; Oya Topaloglu; Fatma Yulek; Nagihan Ugurlu; Reyhan Ersoy; Nurullah Cagil; Bekir Cakir
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 4.  [Glaucoma diagnostics and corneal thickness].

Authors:  J von Eicken; M Kohlhaas; H Höh
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Changes in corneal thickness and curvature after different excimer laser photorefractive procedures and their impact on intraocular pressure measurements.

Authors:  Helena Svedberg; Enping Chen; Helene Hamberg-Nyström
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  [Dynamic contour tonometry].

Authors:  C Kniestedt; H E Kanngiesser
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Central corneal thickness in adult Chinese. Association with ocular and general parameters. The Beijing Eye Study.

Authors:  Haitao Zhang; Liang Xu; Changxi Chen; Jost B Jonas
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.

Authors:  Mona Pache; Sonja Wilmsmeyer; Sonja Lautebach; Jens Funk
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Central corneal thickness and Diaton transpalpebral tonometry.

Authors:  Mustafa Ilker Toker; Ayse Vural; Haydar Erdogan; Aysen Topalkara; Mustafa Kemal Arici
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  [Evaluation of dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus].

Authors:  N Schädle; J D Unterlauft; T Klink; G Geerling
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.