Literature DB >> 14700380

Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants.

Adam R Kaiser1, Karen Iler Kirk, Lorin Lachs, David B Pisoni.   

Abstract

The present study examined how postlingually deafened adults with cochlear implants combine visual information from lipreading with auditory cues in an open-set word recognition task. Adults with normal hearing served as a comparison group. Word recognition performance was assessed using lexically controlled word lists presented under auditory-only, visual-only, and combined audiovisual presentation formats. Effects of talker variability were studied by manipulating the number of talkers producing the stimulus tokens. Lexical competition was investigated using sets of lexically easy and lexically hard test words. To assess the degree of audiovisual integration, a measure of visual enhancement, R(a), was used to assess the gain in performance provided in the audiovisual presentation format relative to the maximum possible performance obtainable in the auditory-only format. Results showed that word recognition performance was highest for audiovisual presentation followed by auditory-only and then visual-only stimulus presentation. Performance was better for single-talker lists than for multiple-talker lists, particularly under the audiovisual presentation format. Word recognition performance was better for the lexically easy than for the lexically hard words regardless of presentation format. Visual enhancement scores were higher for single-talker conditions compared to multiple-talker conditions and tended to be somewhat better for lexically easy words than for lexically hard words. The pattern of results suggests that information from the auditory and visual modalities is used to access common, multimodal lexical representations in memory. The findings are discussed in terms of the complementary nature of auditory and visual sources of information that specify the same underlying gestures and articulatory events in speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14700380      PMCID: PMC3432920          DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/032)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  37 in total

1.  Enhanced speechreading in deaf adults: can short-term training/practice close the gap for hearing adults?

Authors:  L E Bernstein; E T Auer; P E Tucker
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Listening with eye and hand: cross-modal contributions to speech perception.

Authors:  C A Fowler; D J Dekle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Vowel and consonant recognition with the aid of a multichannel cochlear implant.

Authors:  M F Dorman; K Dankowski; G McCandless; J L Parkin; L Smith
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-08

4.  Multimodal perceptual organization of speech: Evidence from tone analogs of spoken utterances.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Jennifer M Fellowes; David B Pisoni; Winston D Goh; Philip E Rubin
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 2.017

5.  Long-term memory in speech perception: Some new findings on talker variability, speaking rate and perceptual learning.

Authors:  David B Pisoni
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.017

6.  Auditory and visual speech perception: confirmation of a modality-independent source of individual differences in speech recognition.

Authors:  C S Watson; W W Qiu; M M Chamberlain; X Li
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Talker-specific learning in speech perception.

Authors:  L C Nygaard; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-04

8.  Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners. I: The effects of response format.

Authors:  M S Sommers; K I Kirk; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; J Fitzke; Z Tu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  41 in total

1.  Assessing spoken word recognition in children who are deaf or hard of hearing: a translational approach.

Authors:  Karen Iler Kirk; Lindsay Prusick; Brian French; Chad Gotch; Laurie S Eisenberg; Nancy Young
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 2.  Some behavioral and neurobiological constraints on theories of audiovisual speech integration: a review and suggestions for new directions.

Authors:  Nicholas Altieri; David B Pisoni; James T Townsend
Journal:  Seeing Perceiving       Date:  2011-09-29

3.  Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Caili Ji; John J Galvin; Yi-ping Chang; Anting Xu; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Development of audiovisual comprehension skills in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tonya R Bergeson; David B Pisoni; Rebecca A O Davis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Evidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators.

Authors:  J Rouger; S Lagleyre; B Fraysse; S Deneve; O Deguine; P Barone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  What can graph theory tell us about word learning and lexical retrieval?

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Use of Partial Stimulus Information by Cochlear Implant Users and Listeners with Normal Hearing in Identifying Spoken Words: Some Preliminary Analyses.

Authors:  Lorin Lachs; Jonathan W Weiss; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Volta Rev       Date:  2000

8.  Some normative data on lip-reading skills (L).

Authors:  Nicholas A Altieri; David B Pisoni; James T Townsend
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Sizing up the competition: quantifying the influence of the mental lexicon on auditory and visual spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Julia F Strand; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation.

Authors:  Ashley Farris-Trimble; Bob McMurray; Nicole Cigrand; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.