Literature DB >> 24686901

Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.

Caili Ji, John J Galvin, Yi-ping Chang, Anting Xu, Qian-Jie Fu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the understanding of English sentences produced by native (English) and nonnative (Spanish) talkers by listeners with normal hearing (NH) and listeners with cochlear implants (CIs). METHOD Sentence recognition in noise was measured in adult subjects with CIs and subjects with NH, all of whom were native talkers of American English. Test sentences were from the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) database and were produced in English by four native and eight nonnative talkers. Subjects also rated the intelligibility and accent for each talker. RESULTS The speech recognition thresholds in noise of subjects with CIs and subjects with NH were 4.23 dB and 1.32 dB poorer with nonnative talkers than with native talkers, respectively. Performance was significantly correlated with talker intelligibility and accent ratings for subjects with CIs but only correlated with talker intelligibility ratings for subjects with NH. For all subjects, performance with individual nonnative talkers was significantly correlated with talkers' number of years of residence in the United States. CONCLUSION CI users exhibited a larger deficit in speech understanding with nonnative talkers than did subjects with NH, relative to native talkers. Nonnative talkers' experience with native culture contributed strongly to speech understanding in noise, intelligibility ratings, and accent ratings of both listeners with NH and listeners with CIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24686901      PMCID: PMC5847326          DOI: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-12-0404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  48 in total

1.  Clear speech perception in acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Sheng Liu; Elsa Del Rio; Ann R Bradlow; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English.

Authors:  Constance M Clarke; Merrill F Garrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners.

Authors:  Satomi Imai; Amanda C Walley; James E Flege
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Phonetic identification in quiet and in noise by listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of talker variability on vowel recognition in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Yi-ping Chang; Qian-jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Shu-Chen Peng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effect of speaking rate on recognition of synthetic and natural speech by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Caili Ji; John J Galvin; Anting Xu; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Identification of steady-state vowels synthesized from the Peterson and Barney measurements.

Authors:  J Hillenbrand; R T Gayvert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  8 in total

1.  Intelligibility of naturally produced and synthesized Mandarin speech by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Ying Shi; Jingyuan Chen; Yue Gong; Biao Chen; Yongxin Li; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Audiovisual Speech Recognition With a Cochlear Implant and Increased Perceptual and Cognitive Demands.

Authors:  Anna R Tinnemore; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  Role of semantic context and talker variability in speech perception of cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Erin R O'Neill; Morgan N Parke; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The Perception of Regional Dialects and Foreign Accents by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; David B Pisoni; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Joseph D Crew; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  The recognition of time-compressed speech as a function of age in listeners with cochlear implants or normal hearing.

Authors:  Anna R Tinnemore; Lauren Montero; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 5.702

7.  Recognition of Accented Speech by Cochlear-Implant Listeners: Benefit of Audiovisual Cues.

Authors:  Emily Waddington; Brittany N Jaekel; Anna R Tinnemore; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Effects of Within-Talker Variability on Speech Intelligibility in Mandarin-Speaking Adult and Pediatric Cochlear Implant Patients.

Authors:  Qiaotong Su; John J Galvin; Guoping Zhang; Yongxin Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.293

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.