Literature DB >> 1775658

Vowel and consonant recognition with the aid of a multichannel cochlear implant.

M F Dorman1, K Dankowski, G McCandless, J L Parkin, L Smith.   

Abstract

In this report we review the vowel and consonant recognition ability of patients who use a multichannel cochlear implant and who achieve relatively good word identification scores. The results suggest that vowel recognition is accomplished by good resolution of the frequency of the first formant (F1) combined with poor resolution of the frequency of the second formant (F2). The results also suggest that consonant recognition is accomplished (1) by using information from the amplitude envelope, including periodicity/aperiodicity, as cues to manner and voicing, (2) by using F1 as an aid to the identification of manner and voicing, and (3) by using information from cochlear place of stimulation to provide a very crude indication of the shape of the frequency spectrum above 1 kHz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1775658     DOI: 10.1080/14640749108400988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  9 in total

1.  Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Adam R Kaiser; Karen Iler Kirk; Lorin Lachs; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Do adults with cochlear implants rely on different acoustic cues for phoneme perception than adults with normal hearing?

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein; Eric Tarr; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; D Bradley Welling; Antoine J Shahin; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ashley Farris-Trimble; Michael Seedorff; Hannah Rigler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 4.  Auditory midbrain implant: a review.

Authors:  Hubert H Lim; Minoo Lenarz; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-09

5.  Waiting for lexical access: Cochlear implants or severely degraded input lead listeners to process speech less incrementally.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ashley Farris-Trimble; Hannah Rigler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-09-14

6.  Auditory Learning Using a Portable Real-Time Vocoder: Preliminary Findings.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Casserly; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Infant-Directed Speech Enhances Attention to Speech in Deaf Infants With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Tonya R Bergeson; Derek M Houston
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  The use of acoustic cues for phonetic identification: effects of spectral degradation and electric hearing.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Monita Chatterjee; William J Idsardi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

9.  Temporal and spectral contributions to musical instrument identification and discrimination among cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Sandra M Prentiss; David R Friedland; Tanner Fullmer; Alison Crane; Timothy Stoddard; Christina L Runge
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-11-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.