Literature DB >> 17404220

Evidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators.

J Rouger1, S Lagleyre, B Fraysse, S Deneve, O Deguine, P Barone.   

Abstract

The cochlear implant (CI) is a neuroprosthesis that allows profoundly deaf patients to recover speech intelligibility. This recovery goes through long-term adaptative processes to build coherent percepts from the coarse information delivered by the implant. Here we analyzed the longitudinal postimplantation evolution of word recognition in a large sample of CI users in unisensory (visual or auditory) and bisensory (visuoauditory) conditions. We found that, despite considerable recovery of auditory performance during the first year postimplantation, CI patients maintain a much higher level of word recognition in speechreading conditions compared with normally hearing subjects, even several years after implantation. Consequently, we show that CI users present higher visuoauditory performance when compared with normally hearing subjects with similar auditory stimuli. This better performance is not only due to greater speechreading performance, but, most importantly, also due to a greater capacity to integrate visual input with the distorted speech signal. Our results suggest that these behavioral changes in CI users might be mediated by a reorganization of the cortical network involved in speech recognition that favors a more specific involvement of visual areas. Furthermore, they provide crucial indications to guide the rehabilitation of CI patients by using visually oriented therapeutic strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17404220      PMCID: PMC1855404          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0609419104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  42 in total

1.  Neural plasticity detected in short- and long-term cochlear implant users using PET.

Authors:  H Nishimura; K Doi; T Iwaki; K Hashikawa; N Oku; T Teratani; T Hasegawa; A Watanabe; T Nishimura; T Kubo
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-03-20       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Neuropsychology: pitch discrimination in the early blind.

Authors:  Frédéric Gougoux; Franco Lepore; Maryse Lassonde; Patrice Voss; Robert J Zatorre; Pascal Belin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The role of visual speech cues in reducing energetic and informational masking.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Phonetic identification in quiet and in noise by listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory-visual speech perception and aging.

Authors:  Kathleen M Cienkowski; Arlene Earley Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Audiovisual integration in patients with visual deficit.

Authors:  Francesca Frassinetti; Nadia Bolognini; Davide Bottari; Annalisa Bonora; Elisabetta Làdavas
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Schizophrenia, the heteromodal association neocortex and development: potential for a neurogenetic approach.

Authors:  C A Ross; G D Pearlson
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 10.  Cochlear implantation for the treatment of deafness.

Authors:  Benjamin J Copeland; Harold C Pillsbury
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 13.739

View more
  64 in total

Review 1.  Cued speech for enhancing speech perception and first language development of children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jacqueline Leybaert; Carol J LaSasso
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

Review 2.  Development of multisensory integration from the perspective of the individual neuron.

Authors:  Barry E Stein; Terrence R Stanford; Benjamin A Rowland
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Understanding hearing through deafness.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Auditory-visual speech perception in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sheetal Desai; Ginger Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Crossmodal processing.

Authors:  Charles Spence; Daniel Senkowski; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Cross-Modal Plasticity in Higher-Order Auditory Cortex of Congenitally Deaf Cats Does Not Limit Auditory Responsiveness to Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Rüdiger Land; Peter Baumhoff; Jochen Tillein; Stephen G Lomber; Peter Hubka; Andrej Kral
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Cross-Modal Competition: The Default Computation for Multisensory Processing.

Authors:  Liping Yu; Cristiano Cuppini; Jinghong Xu; Benjamin A Rowland; Barry E Stein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Adaptive benefit of cross-modal plasticity following cochlear implantation in deaf adults.

Authors:  Carly A Anderson; Ian M Wiggins; Pádraig T Kitterick; Douglas E H Hartley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Neural reorganization following sensory loss: the opportunity of change.

Authors:  Lotfi B Merabet; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 10.  Development and plasticity of intra- and intersensory information processing.

Authors:  Daniel B Polley; Andrea R Hillock; Christopher Spankovich; Maria V Popescu; David W Royal; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.