Literature DB >> 21686052

Use of Partial Stimulus Information by Cochlear Implant Users and Listeners with Normal Hearing in Identifying Spoken Words: Some Preliminary Analyses.

Lorin Lachs1, Jonathan W Weiss, David B Pisoni.   

Abstract

An error analysis of the word recognition responses of cochlear implant users and listeners with normal hearing was conducted to determine the types of partial information used by these two populations when they identified spoken words under auditory-alone and audiovisual conditions. The results revealed that the two groups used different types of partial information in identifying spoken words under auditory-alone or audiovisual presentation. Different types of partial information were also used in identifying words with different lexical properties. In our study, however, there were no significant interactions with hearing status, indicating that cochlear implant users and listeners with normal hearing identify spoken words in a similar manner. The information available to users with cochlear implants preserves much of the partial information necessary for accurate spoken word recognition.

Year:  2000        PMID: 21686052      PMCID: PMC3115540     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Volta Rev        ISSN: 0042-8639


  17 in total

1.  Cognitive factors and cochlear implants: some thoughts on perception, learning, and memory in speech perception.

Authors:  D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Adam R Kaiser; Karen Iler Kirk; Lorin Lachs; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Speechreading and the structure of the lexicon: computationally modeling the effects of reduced phonetic distinctiveness on lexical uniqueness.

Authors:  E T Auer; L E Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Talker-specific learning in speech perception.

Authors:  L C Nygaard; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-04

5.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  J W Mullennix; D B Pisoni; C S Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Interaction of audition and vision in the recognition of oral speech stimuli.

Authors:  N P Erber
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1969-06

7.  Effects of training on the visual recognition of consonants.

Authors:  B E Walden; R A Prosek; A A Montgomery; C K Scherr; C J Jones
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1977-03

8.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Speech perception by prelingually deaf children using cochlear implants.

Authors:  R S Tyler; H Fryauf-Bertschy; D M Kelsay; B J Gantz; G P Woodworth; A Parkinson
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Speech perception in perceivers with hearing loss: synergy of multiple modalities.

Authors:  D W Massaro; M M Cohen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  2 in total

1.  Language identification from visual-only speech signals.

Authors:  Rebecca E Ronquest; Susannah V Levi; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Visual speech primes open-set recognition of spoken words.

Authors:  Adam B Buchwald; Stephen J Winters; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2009
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.