Literature DB >> 21786870

Some normative data on lip-reading skills (L).

Nicholas A Altieri1, David B Pisoni, James T Townsend.   

Abstract

The ability to obtain reliable phonetic information from a talker's face during speech perception is an important skill. However, lip-reading abilities vary considerably across individuals. There is currently a lack of normative data on lip-reading abilities in young normal-hearing listeners. This letter describes results obtained from a visual-only sentence recognition experiment using CUNY sentences and provides the mean number of words correct and the standard deviation for different sentence lengths. Additionally, the method for calculating T-scores is provided to facilitate the conversion between raw and standardized scores. This metric can be utilized by clinicians and researchers in lip-reading studies. This statistic provides a useful benchmark for determining whether an individual's lip-reading score falls within the normal range, or whether it is above or below this range.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21786870      PMCID: PMC3155585          DOI: 10.1121/1.3593376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Measures of auditory-visual integration in nonsense syllables and sentences.

Authors:  K W Grant; P F Seitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Visual speech perception without primary auditory cortex activation.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Edward T Auer; Jean K Moore; Curtis W Ponton; Manual Don; Manbir Singh
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-03-04       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Adam R Kaiser; Karen Iler Kirk; Lorin Lachs; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove; Ken W Grant; David Poeppel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Voice fundamental frequency as an auditory supplement to the speechreading of sentences.

Authors:  A Boothroyd; T Hnath-Chisolm; L Hanin; L Kishon-Rabin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Auditory-visual speech perception and auditory-visual enhancement in normal-hearing younger and older adults.

Authors:  Mitchell S Sommers; Nancy Tye-Murray; Brent Spehar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Lipreading, processing speed, and working memory in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Julia E Feld; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Enhanced visual speech perception in individuals with early-onset hearing impairment.

Authors:  Edward T Auer; Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.297

  8 in total
  11 in total

1.  Experiments on Auditory-Visual Perception of Sentences by Users of Unilateral, Bimodal, and Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Julie Liss; Shuai Wang; Visar Berisha; Cimarron Ludwig; Sarah Cook Natale
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Normative data on audiovisual speech integration using sentence recognition and capacity measures.

Authors:  Nicholas Altieri; Daniel Hudock
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Visual Reliance During Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users and Candidates.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Kara J Vasil; Christin Ray
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Cross-modal prediction in speech depends on prior linguistic experience.

Authors:  Carolina Sánchez-García; James T Enns; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The contribution of visual information to the perception of speech in noise with and without informative temporal fine structure.

Authors:  Paula C Stacey; Pádraig T Kitterick; Saffron D Morris; Christian J Sumner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 6.  Perspectives on Human Hearing Loss, Cochlear Regeneration, and the Potential for Hearing Restoration Therapies.

Authors:  Patricia M White
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-10-20

7.  Audiovisual speech is more than the sum of its parts: Auditory-visual superadditivity compensates for age-related declines in audible and lipread speech intelligibility.

Authors:  James W Dias; Carolyn M McClaskey; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2021-06

8.  Hearing impairment and audiovisual speech integration ability: a case study report.

Authors:  Nicholas Altieri; Daniel Hudock
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-01

9.  Speech-evoked activation in adult temporal cortex measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS): Are the measurements reliable?

Authors:  Ian M Wiggins; Carly A Anderson; Pádraig T Kitterick; Douglas E H Hartley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Presbycusis: do we have a third ear?

Authors:  Luis Roque Reis; Pedro Escada
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.