Literature DB >> 24041330

The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation.

Ashley Farris-Trimble1, Bob McMurray1, Nicole Cigrand1, J Bruce Tomblin2.   

Abstract

Though much is known about how words are recognized, little research has focused on how a degraded signal affects the fine-grained temporal aspects of real-time word recognition. The perception of degraded speech was examined in two populations with the goal of describing the time course of word recognition and lexical competition. Thirty-three postlingually deafened cochlear implant (CI) users and 57 normal hearing (NH) adults (16 in a CI-simulation condition) participated in a visual world paradigm eye-tracking task in which their fixations to a set of phonologically related items were monitored as they heard one item being named. Each degraded-speech group was compared with a set of age-matched NH participants listening to unfiltered speech. CI users and the simulation group showed a delay in activation relative to the NH listeners, and there is weak evidence that the CI users showed differences in the degree of peak and late competitor activation. In general, though, the degraded-speech groups behaved statistically similarly with respect to activation levels. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24041330      PMCID: PMC3946825          DOI: 10.1037/a0034353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  74 in total

1.  Effects of electrode configuration and frequency allocation on vowel recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  S Rosen; A Faulkner; L Wilkinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Adaptation by a cochlear-implant patient to upward shifts in the frequency representation of speech.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Darlene Ketten
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; D Rainey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing.

Authors:  P Zwitserlood
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1989-06

6.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.

Authors:  W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

8.  Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies.

Authors:  W Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-08-24       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Children discover the spectral skeletons in their native language before the amplitude envelopes.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein; Robert R Packer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Patient performance over eighteen months with the Ineraid intracochlear implant.

Authors:  R F Gray; S J Quinn; I Court; Z Vanat; D M Baguley
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1995-09
View more
  28 in total

1.  The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ashley Farris-Trimble; Michael Seedorff; Hannah Rigler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  How Do You Deal With Uncertainty? Cochlear Implant Users Differ in the Dynamics of Lexical Processing of Noncanonical Inputs.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Tyler P Ellis; Keith S Apfelbaum
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  The slow developmental time course of real-time spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Hannah Rigler; Ashley Farris-Trimble; Lea Greiner; Jessica Walker; J Bruce Tomblin; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2015-10-19

4.  Waiting for lexical access: Cochlear implants or severely degraded input lead listeners to process speech less incrementally.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Ashley Farris-Trimble; Hannah Rigler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-09-14

5.  The pictures who shall not be named: Empirical support for benefits of preview in the Visual World Paradigm.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Jamie Klein-Packard; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Learning During Processing: Word Learning Doesn't Wait for Word Recognition to Finish.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-07-29

7.  Time-Gated Word Recognition in Children: Effects of Auditory Access, Age, and Semantic Context.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Walker; David Kessler; Kelsey Klein; Meredith Spratford; Jacob J Oleson; Anne Welhaven; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Lexical bias in word recognition by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Steven P Gianakas; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Detecting time-specific differences between temporal nonlinear curves: Analyzing data from the visual world paradigm.

Authors:  Jacob J Oleson; Joseph E Cavanaugh; Bob McMurray; Grant Brown
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Test-retest reliability of eye tracking in the visual world paradigm for the study of real-time spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Ashley Farris-Trimble; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.