Literature DB >> 22668766

Assessing spoken word recognition in children who are deaf or hard of hearing: a translational approach.

Karen Iler Kirk1, Lindsay Prusick, Brian French, Chad Gotch, Laurie S Eisenberg, Nancy Young.   

Abstract

Under natural conditions, listeners use both auditory and visual speech cues to extract meaning from speech signals containing many sources of variability. However, traditional clinical tests of spoken word recognition routinely employ isolated words or sentences produced by a single talker in an auditory-only presentation format. The more central cognitive processes used during multimodal integration, perceptual normalization, and lexical discrimination that may contribute to individual variation in spoken word recognition performance are not assessed in conventional tests of this kind. In this article, we review our past and current research activities aimed at developing a series of new assessment tools designed to evaluate spoken word recognition in children who are deaf or hard of hearing. These measures are theoretically motivated by a current model of spoken word recognition and also incorporate "real-world" stimulus variability in the form of multiple talkers and presentation formats. The goal of this research is to enhance our ability to estimate real-world listening skills and to predict benefit from sensory aid use in children with varying degrees of hearing loss. American Academy of Audiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22668766      PMCID: PMC3577069          DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.23.6.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  50 in total

1.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford; Anthony J Spahr; Sharon A McKarns
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Multiple routes to the perceptual learning of speech.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; Tessa Bent; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The development of recorded auditory tests for measuring hearing loss for speech.

Authors:  C V HUDGINS; J E HAWKINS
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1947-01       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 6.  Factors influencing spoken language outcomes in children following early cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ann E Geers
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006

7.  Improving speech perception in noise for children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Amy P Olund; Melissa Dejong
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.

Authors:  Ann Geers; Chris Brenner; Lisa Davidson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Communication abilities of children with aided residual hearing: comparison with cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Laurie S Eisenberg; Karen Iler Kirk; Amy Schaefer Martinez; Elizabeth A Ying; Richard T Miyamoto
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-05

10.  Speech recognition in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of standard HiRes and HiRes 120 sound processing.

Authors:  Jill B Firszt; Laura K Holden; Ruth M Reeder; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  9 in total

1.  Deaf children with cochlear implants do not appear to use sentence context to help recognize spoken words.

Authors:  Christopher M Conway; Joanne A Deocampo; Anne M Walk; Esperanza M Anaya; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Understanding Language, Hearing Status, and Visual-Spatial Skills.

Authors:  Marc Marschark; Linda J Spencer; Andreana Durkin; Georgianna Borgna; Carol Convertino; Elizabeth Machmer; William G Kronenberger; Alexandra Trani
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2015-07-03

3.  The impact of electric hearing on children's timbre and pitch perception and talker discrimination.

Authors:  Kristin M Sjoberg; Virginia D Driscoll; Kate Gfeller; Anne E Welhaven; Karen Iler Kirk; Lindsay Prusick
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2017-01-18

4.  Experiments on Auditory-Visual Perception of Sentences by Users of Unilateral, Bimodal, and Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Julie Liss; Shuai Wang; Visar Berisha; Cimarron Ludwig; Sarah Cook Natale
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Audiovisual Enhancement of Speech Perception in Noise by School-Age Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.

Authors:  Kaylah Lalonde; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Working Memory and Speech Recognition in Noise Under Ecologically Relevant Listening Conditions: Effects of Visual Cues and Noise Type Among Adults With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Christi W Miller; Erin K Stewart; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Christopher Bishop; Ruth A Bentler; Kelly Tremblay
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Visual speech alters the discrimination and identification of non-intact auditory speech in children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Susan Jerger; Markus F Damian; Rachel P McAlpine; Hervé Abdi
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 1.675

8.  The Effects of Static and Moving Spectral Ripple Sensitivity on Unaided and Aided Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Christi W Miller; Joshua G W Bernstein; Xuyang Zhang; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Ruth A Bentler; Kelly Tremblay
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Longitudinal Speech Recognition in Noise in Children: Effects of Hearing Status and Vocabulary.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Walker; Caitlin Sapp; Jacob J Oleson; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.