Literature DB >> 21895103

Sizing up the competition: quantifying the influence of the mental lexicon on auditory and visual spoken word recognition.

Julia F Strand1, Mitchell S Sommers.   

Abstract

Much research has explored how spoken word recognition is influenced by the architecture and dynamics of the mental lexicon (e.g., Luce and Pisoni, 1998; McClelland and Elman, 1986). A more recent question is whether the processes underlying word recognition are unique to the auditory domain, or whether visually perceived (lipread) speech may also be sensitive to the structure of the mental lexicon (Auer, 2002; Mattys, Bernstein, and Auer, 2002). The current research was designed to test the hypothesis that both aurally and visually perceived spoken words are isolated in the mental lexicon as a function of their modality-specific perceptual similarity to other words. Lexical competition (the extent to which perceptually similar words influence recognition of a stimulus word) was quantified using metrics that are well-established in the literature, as well as a statistical method for calculating perceptual confusability based on the phi-square statistic. Both auditory and visual spoken word recognition were influenced by modality-specific lexical competition as well as stimulus word frequency. These findings extend the scope of activation-competition models of spoken word recognition and reinforce the hypothesis (Auer, 2002; Mattys et al., 2002) that perceptual and cognitive properties underlying spoken word recognition are not specific to the auditory domain. In addition, the results support the use of the phi-square statistic as a better predictor of lexical competition than metrics currently used in models of spoken word recognition.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21895103      PMCID: PMC3188976          DOI: 10.1121/1.3613930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Stimulus-based lexical distinctiveness as a general word-recognition mechanism.

Authors:  Sven L Mattys; Lynne E Bernstein; Edward T Auer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-05

2.  Lexical neighborhood effects in phonetic processing.

Authors:  R S Newman; J R Sawusch; P A Luce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Priming Lexical Neighbors of Spoken Words: Effects of Competition and Inhibition.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Paul A Luce; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  1989-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.

Authors:  W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

6.  Confusions among visually perceived consonants.

Authors:  C G Fisher
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1968-12

7.  Visemes observed by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing adult viewers.

Authors:  E Owens; B Blazek
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

8.  Spoken word recognition by eye.

Authors:  Edward T Auer
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-10

9.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08

10.  Auditory and visual lexical neighborhoods in audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Mitchell Sommers; Brent Spehar
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-12
View more
  6 in total

1.  Phonological Neighborhood Competition Affects Spoken Word Production Irrespective of Sentential Context.

Authors:  Neal P Fox; Megan Reilly; Sheila E Blumstein
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Revisiting the target-masker linguistic similarity hypothesis.

Authors:  Violet A Brown; Naseem H Dillman-Hasso; ZhaoBin Li; Lucia Ray; Ellen Mamantov; Kristin J Van Engen; Julia F Strand
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Lipreading: A Review of Its Continuing Importance for Speech Recognition With an Acquired Hearing Loss and Possibilities for Effective Training.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Nicole Jordan; Edward T Auer; Silvio P Eberhardt
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 1.636

4.  Grammatical context constrains lexical competition in spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Julia Strand; Andrea Simenstad; Allison Cooperman; Jonathon Rowe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-05

Review 5.  Neural pathways for visual speech perception.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Einat Liebenthal
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Speechreading in Deaf Adults with Cochlear Implants: Evidence for Perceptual Compensation.

Authors:  Hannah Pimperton; Amelia Ralph-Lewis; Mairéad MacSweeney
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.