Literature DB >> 9857516

The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels.

M F Dorman1, P C Loizou, J Fitzke, Z Tu.   

Abstract

Sentences were processed through simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6, 8, 12, 16, and 20 channels and were presented to normal-hearing listeners at +2 db S/N and at -2 db S/N. The signal-processing operations included bandpass filtering, rectification, and smoothing of the signal in each band, estimation of the rms energy of the signal in each band (computed every 4 ms), and generation of sinusoids with frequencies equal to the center frequencies of the bands and amplitudes equal to the rms levels in each band. The sinusoids were summed and presented to listeners for identification. At issue was the number of channels necessary to reach maximum performance on tests of sentence understanding. At +2 dB S/N, the performance maximum was reached with 12 channels of stimulation. At -2 dB S/N, the performance maximum was reached with 20 channels of stimulation. These results, in combination with the outcome that in quiet, asymptotic performance is reached with five channels of stimulation, demonstrate that more channels are needed in noise than in quiet to reach a high level of sentence understanding and that, as the S/N becomes poorer, more channels are needed to achieve a given level of performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9857516     DOI: 10.1121/1.423940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  62 in total

1.  Cochlear implantation updates: the Dallas Cochlear Implant Program.

Authors:  Emily A Tobey; Lana Britt; Ann Geers; Philip Loizou; Betty Loy; Peter Roland; Andrea Warner-Czyz; Charles G Wright
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Across-site variation in detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Li Xu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-11-20

3.  Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Adam R Kaiser; Karen Iler Kirk; Lorin Lachs; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: implications for cochlear prostheses.

Authors:  Li Xu; Yuhjung Tsai; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Combined spectral and temporal enhancement to improve cochlear-implant speech perception.

Authors:  Aparajita Bhattacharya; Andrew Vandali; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

7.  Using temporal modulation sensitivity to select stimulation sites for processor MAPs in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Teresa A Zwolan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Sherol Chinchilla; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05-20

9.  Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition.

Authors:  Li Xu; Catherine S Thompson; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  The development of the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear implant system.

Authors:  James F Patrick; Peter A Busby; Peter J Gibson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.