Literature DB >> 8759968

Auditory and visual speech perception: confirmation of a modality-independent source of individual differences in speech recognition.

C S Watson1, W W Qiu, M M Chamberlain, X Li.   

Abstract

Two experiments were run to determine whether individual differences in auditory speech-recognition abilities are significantly correlated with those for speech reading (lipreading), employing a total sample of 90 normal-hearing college students. Tests include single words and sentences, recorded on a videodisc by a male speaker [Bernstein and Eberhardt, Johns Hopkins Lipreading Corpus, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 1986]. The auditory speech was presented with a white noise masker, at -7 dB Sp/N. The correlations between overall auditory and visual performance were 0.52 and 0.43 in the two experiments, consistent with the existence of a modality-independent ability to perceive linguistic "wholes" on the basis of linguistic fragments. Subjects in the second experiment also identified printed sentences, with 40%-60% portions of the printed characters deleted. Performance on this graphical "fragmented-sentences test" also correlated significantly with auditory speech recognition, providing a possible clue to the cognitive basis for the look-versus-listen correlation. The existence of a modality-independent source of variance in speech-recognition abilities may be a partial explanation of the difficulty in demonstrating strong associations between psychoacoustic measures of spectral or temporal acuity, and speech discrimination or identification. Female subjects in both experiments were significantly better lipreaders than their male counterparts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8759968     DOI: 10.1121/1.416300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  Analysis and analogy in the perception of vowels.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Jennifer M Fellowes; Eva Y Blumenthal; Dalia Shoretz Nagel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-10

2.  Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Adam R Kaiser; Karen Iler Kirk; Lorin Lachs; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Using individual differences to test the role of temporal and place cues in coding frequency modulation.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Integration of Partial Information Within and Across Modalities: Contributions to Spoken and Written Sentence Recognition.

Authors:  Kimberly G Smith; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 5.  The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Chelsea Bates; Michael S Harris; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Long-term musical experience and auditory and visual perceptual abilities under adverse conditions.

Authors:  Esperanza M Anaya; David B Pisoni; William G Kronenberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perceptual Organization of Interrupted Speech and Text.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Daniel Fogerty; Kimberly Smith; Stanley Sheft
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  The development of multisensory speech perception continues into the late childhood years.

Authors:  Lars A Ross; Sophie Molholm; Daniella Blanco; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Dave Saint-Amour; John J Foxe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Evaluation of Speech-Perception Training for Hearing Aid Users: A Multisite Study in Progress.

Authors:  James D Miller; Charles S Watson; Judy R Dubno; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

10.  Lipreading, processing speed, and working memory in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Julia E Feld; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.