Literature DB >> 11039345

CT of the head by use of reduced current and kilovoltage: relationship between image quality and dose reduction.

M Cohnen1, H Fischer, J Hamacher, E Lins, R Kötter, U Mödder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: CT is a frequent examination that is performed using ionizing radiation. We sought to assess image-quality changes on CT scans of the head when the radiation dose is reduced by changing tube current and kilovoltage.
METHODS: A formalin-fixed cadaver was examined in conventional and helical mode by use of two CT-scanners. Surface dose was measured with standard scanning parameters, and after reduction of tube current and kilovoltage. Five experienced examiners independently evaluated subjective image quality.
RESULTS: In the conventional mode, the highest surface dose was 83.2 mGy (scanner 1: helical mode, 55.6 mGy), and 66.0 mGy (scanner 2: helical mode, 55.9 mGy). By changing kVp and mAs, a dose reduction of up to 75% (scanner 1), and 60% (scanner 2) was achieved. No observable differences in image quality between scans obtained with doses from 100% to 60% of standard settings were noted. Ten of 20 images obtained with the highest dose and 13 of 20 images obtained with lowest dose (19-29.4 mGy) were reliably identified by subjective quality assessment. Scans produced with a surface dose of less than 30 mGy were judged uninterpretable.
CONCLUSION: Standard parameters used in cranial CT are oriented toward best image quality. A dose reduction up to 40% may be possible without loss of diagnostic image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11039345      PMCID: PMC8174866     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  26 in total

1.  Low-dose high-resolution CT of lung parenchyma.

Authors:  C V Zwirewich; J R Mayo; N L Müller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Gantry angulation in brain CT: dosage implications, effect on posterior fossa artifacts, and current international practice.

Authors:  L J Yeoman; L Howarth; A Britten; A Cotterill; E J Adam
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Image quality and dose in spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  F R Verdun; R A Meuli; F O Bochud; C Imsand; S Raimondi; P Schnyder; J F Valley
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  [Dosage measurements in spiral CT examinations of the head and neck region].

Authors:  M Cohnen; B Cohnen; K Ewen; G Teubert; U Mödder
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1998-05

5.  Low-contrast resolution in volumetric x-ray CT--analytical comparison between conventional and spiral CT.

Authors:  G Wang; M W Vannier
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Low-dose CT of the lungs: preliminary observations.

Authors:  D P Naidich; C H Marshall; C Gribbin; R S Arams; D I McCauley
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Average radiation doses in a standard head examination for 250 CT systems.

Authors:  J L McCrohan; J F Patterson; R M Gagne; H A Goldstein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Radiation dose to the lens from CT brain scans in general radiology departments.

Authors:  A C Maclennan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Patient doses from standard and spiral CT of the head using a fast twin-beam system.

Authors:  H Seifert; T Hagen; K Bartylla; G Blass; U Piepgras
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  CT standard protocols are of limited value in assessing actual patient dose.

Authors:  J P Wade; J C Weyman; K E Goldstone
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  33 in total

1.  Dose and image quality. How does the choice of kilovoltage affect patient dose, scattered radiation, and image quality in CT examinations? Submitted by Glen Thomson, Middlemore Hospital, New Zealand.

Authors:  Walter Huda
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-12-05

2.  Management of patient dose and image noise in routine pediatric CT abdominal examinations.

Authors:  Francis R Verdun; D Lepori; Pascal Monnin; Jean-François Valley; Pierre Schnyder; F Gudinchet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Use of the lowest necessary radiation dose.

Authors:  Allan J Fox
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Comparison of image quality between conventional and low-dose nonenhanced head CT.

Authors:  Mark E Mullins; Michael H Lev; Peter Bove; Cara E O'Reilly; Sanjay Saini; James T Rhea; James H Thrall; George J Hunter; Leena M Hamberg; R Gilberto Gonzalez
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Dose reduction and image quality in CT angiography for cerebral aneurysm with various tube potentials and current settings.

Authors:  K Imai; M Ikeda; C Kawaura; T Aoyama; Y Enchi; M Yamauchi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Computational and human observer image quality evaluation of low dose, knowledge-based CT iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Brendan L Eck; Rachid Fahmi; Kevin M Brown; Stanislav Zabic; Nilgoun Raihani; Jun Miao; David L Wilson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Radiation exposure of patients in comprehensive computed tomography of the head in acute stroke.

Authors:  M Cohnen; H-J Wittsack; S Assadi; K Muskalla; A Ringelstein; L W Poll; A Saleh; U Mödder
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Multislice CT of the pelvis: dose reduction with regard to image quality using 16-row CT.

Authors:  Jessen Gurung; M Fawad Khan; Adel Maataoui; C Herzog; R Bux; H Bratzke; Hanns Ackermann; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Assessment of image quality of a standard and three dose-reducing protocols in adult cranial CT.

Authors:  Sadi Gündoğdu; Kamran Mahmutyazicioğlu; Hüseyin Ozdemir; Ahmet Savranlar; Kiyasettin Asil
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Improvement of image quality of multislice spiral CT scans of the head and neck region using a raw data-based multidimensional adaptive filtering (MAF) technique.

Authors:  Ulrich Baum; Katharina Anders; Gregor Steinbichler; Michael Lell; Holger Greess; Thomas Riedel; Marc Kachelriess; Willi A Kalender; Werner A Bautz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.