Literature DB >> 26429285

Computational and human observer image quality evaluation of low dose, knowledge-based CT iterative reconstruction.

Brendan L Eck1, Rachid Fahmi1, Kevin M Brown2, Stanislav Zabic2, Nilgoun Raihani2, Jun Miao1, David L Wilson3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Aims in this study are to (1) develop a computational model observer which reliably tracks the detectability of human observers in low dose computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed with knowledge-based iterative reconstruction (IMR™, Philips Healthcare) and filtered back projection (FBP) across a range of independent variables, (2) use the model to evaluate detectability trends across reconstructions and make predictions of human observer detectability, and (3) perform human observer studies based on model predictions to demonstrate applications of the model in CT imaging.
METHODS: Detectability (d') was evaluated in phantom studies across a range of conditions. Images were generated using a numerical CT simulator. Trained observers performed 4-alternative forced choice (4-AFC) experiments across dose (1.3, 2.7, 4.0 mGy), pin size (4, 6, 8 mm), contrast (0.3%, 0.5%, 1.0%), and reconstruction (FBP, IMR), at fixed display window. A five-channel Laguerre-Gauss channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) was developed with internal noise added to the decision variable and/or to channel outputs, creating six different internal noise models. Semianalytic internal noise computation was tested against Monte Carlo and used to accelerate internal noise parameter optimization. Model parameters were estimated from all experiments at once using maximum likelihood on the probability correct, PC. Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to compare models of different orders. The best model was selected according to AIC and used to predict detectability in blended FBP-IMR images, analyze trends in IMR detectability improvements, and predict dose savings with IMR. Predicted dose savings were compared against 4-AFC study results using physical CT phantom images.
RESULTS: Detection in IMR was greater than FBP in all tested conditions. The CHO with internal noise proportional to channel output standard deviations, Model-k4, showed the best trade-off between fit and model complexity according to AICc. With parameters fixed, the model reasonably predicted detectability of human observers in blended FBP-IMR images. Semianalytic internal noise computation gave results equivalent to Monte Carlo, greatly speeding parameter estimation. Using Model-k4, the authors found an average detectability improvement of 2.7 ± 0.4 times that of FBP. IMR showed greater improvements in detectability with larger signals and relatively consistent improvements across signal contrast and x-ray dose. In the phantom tested, Model-k4 predicted an 82% dose reduction compared to FBP, verified with physical CT scans at 80% reduced dose.
CONCLUSIONS: IMR improves detectability over FBP and may enable significant dose reductions. A channelized Hotelling observer with internal noise proportional to channel output standard deviation agreed well with human observers across a wide range of variables, even across reconstructions with drastically different image characteristics. Utility of the model observer was demonstrated by predicting the effect of image processing (blending), analyzing detectability improvements with IMR across dose, size, and contrast, and in guiding real CT scan dose reduction experiments. Such a model observer can be applied in optimizing parameters in advanced iterative reconstruction algorithms as well as guiding dose reduction protocols in physical CT experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26429285      PMCID: PMC4592430          DOI: 10.1118/1.4929973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  50 in total

1.  The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

2.  Validating the use of channels to estimate the ideal linear observer.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  CT image assessment by low contrast signal detectability evaluation with unknown signal location.

Authors:  Lucretiu M Popescu; Kyle J Myers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction algorithm: can super-low-dose cardiac CT be applicable in clinical settings?

Authors:  Seitaro Oda; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Yoshinori Funama; Kazuhiro Katahira; Keiichi Honda; Shinichi Tokuyasu; Mani Vembar; Hideaki Yuki; Katsuo Noda; Shuichi Oshima; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Development and evaluation of a software tool for the generation of virtual liver lesions in multidetector-row CT datasets.

Authors:  Konstantinos Karantzavelos; Hoen-Oh Shin; Steffen Jördens; Benjamin King; Kristina Ringe; Dagmar Hartung; Frank Wacker; Christian von Falck
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Correlation between human and model observer performance for discrimination task in CT.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Rickey E Carter; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Prediction of human observer performance in a 2-alternative forced choice low-contrast detection task using channelized Hotelling observer: impact of radiation dose and reconstruction algorithms.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Shuai Leng; Lingyun Chen; James M Kofler; Rickey E Carter; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Correlation between model observer and human observer performance in CT imaging when lesion location is uncertain.

Authors:  Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Yi Zhang; Rickey Carter; Alicia Y Toledano; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Richard Doll; Dudley T Goodhead; Eric J Hall; Charles E Land; John B Little; Jay H Lubin; Dale L Preston; R Julian Preston; Jerome S Puskin; Elaine Ron; Rainer K Sachs; Jonathan M Samet; Richard B Setlow; Marco Zaider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Model observers in medical imaging research.

Authors:  Xin He; Subok Park
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 11.556

View more
  14 in total

1.  Optimization of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) acquisition parameters for human observers: effect of reconstruction algorithms.

Authors:  Rongping Zeng; Aldo Badano; Kyle J Myers
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Correlation between human detection accuracy and observer model-based image quality metrics in computed tomography.

Authors:  Justin Solomon; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-09-22

Review 3.  Current Applications and Future Impact of Machine Learning in Radiology.

Authors:  Garry Choy; Omid Khalilzadeh; Mark Michalski; Synho Do; Anthony E Samir; Oleg S Pianykh; J Raymond Geis; Pari V Pandharipande; James A Brink; Keith J Dreyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Regularization strategies in statistical image reconstruction of low-dose x-ray CT: A review.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Jing Wang; Dong Zeng; Xi Tao; Jianhua Ma
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Automated reference-free detection of motion artifacts in magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Thomas Küstner; Annika Liebgott; Lukas Mauch; Petros Martirosian; Fabian Bamberg; Konstantin Nikolaou; Bin Yang; Fritz Schick; Sergios Gatidis
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Evaluation of low-contrast detectability for iterative reconstruction in pediatric abdominal computed tomography: a phantom study.

Authors:  Nicholas Rubert; Richard Southard; Susan M Hamman; Ryan Robison
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-11-09

7.  Computational reader design and statistical performance evaluation of an in-silico imaging clinical trial comparing digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Rongping Zeng; Frank W Samuelson; Diksha Sharma; Andreu Badal; Graff G Christian; Stephen J Glick; Kyle J Myers; Aldo Badano
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-02-26

8.  A Task-dependent Investigation on Dose and Texture in CT Image Reconstruction.

Authors:  Yongfeng Gao; Zhengrong Liang; Hao Zhang; Jie Yang; John Ferretti; Thomas Bilfinger; Kavitha Yaddanapudi; Mark Schweitzer; Priya Bhattacharji; William Moore
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2019-12-04

9.  A simple method for low-contrast detectability, image quality and dose optimisation with CT iterative reconstruction algorithms and model observers.

Authors:  Luca Bellesi; Rolf Wyttenbach; Diego Gaudino; Paolo Colleoni; Francesco Pupillo; Mauro Carrara; Antonio Braghetti; Carla Puligheddu; Stefano Presilla
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2017-10-23

10.  A consistency evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio in the quality assessment of human brain magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Shaode Yu; Guangzhe Dai; Zhaoyang Wang; Leida Li; Xinhua Wei; Yaoqin Xie
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.