Literature DB >> 1609066

Gantry angulation in brain CT: dosage implications, effect on posterior fossa artifacts, and current international practice.

L J Yeoman1, L Howarth, A Britten, A Cotterill, E J Adam.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was first to determine the effect of use of different scan planes at computed tomography (CT) of the brain on lens radiation dose and on severity of posterior fossa artifact. Twenty patients requiring nonenhanced and contrast material-enhanced brain CT scanning were selected. Each was scanned with two different beam angulations, one passing through the eyes and one avoiding them, and the resulting radiation doses were measured. Angling of the beam to avoid the orbit reduced the dose by 87%, while the severity of posterior fossa artifacts was not significantly different. Second, the implications of these results was assessed by means of an international questionnaire survey of current scanning technique. Only 32% of the respondents routinely avoided the eye during brain CT. No single scan plane was accepted by the respondents as being superior in terms of minimizing posterior fossa artifact. The authors conclude that the potential exists for a reduction in lens dose after reappraisal of radiologic practice in brain CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1609066     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.184.1.1609066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  16 in total

1.  CT of the head by use of reduced current and kilovoltage: relationship between image quality and dose reduction.

Authors:  M Cohnen; H Fischer; J Hamacher; E Lins; R Kötter; U Mödder
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Lens exposure during brain scans using multidetector row CT scanners: methods for estimation of lens dose.

Authors:  S Suzuki; S Furui; T Ishitake; T Abe; H Machida; R Takei; K Ibukuro; A Watanabe; T Kidouchi; Y Nakano
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Cranial CT with 64-, 16-, 4- and single-slice CT systems-comparison of image quality and posterior fossa artifacts in routine brain imaging with standard protocols.

Authors:  Birgit Ertl-Wagner; Lara Eftimov; Jeffrey Blume; Roland Bruening; Christoph Becker; Jean Cormack; Hartmut Brueckmann; Maximilian Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Radiation dose to the lenses in CT of the paranasal sinuses.

Authors:  G Moulin; C Chagnaud; S Waultier; B Le Brigand; M Espagnan; P Dessi; J M Bartoli; P Châtenet; G Botti
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Cumulative radiation dose in patients admitted with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective study using a self-developing film badge.

Authors:  A C Mamourian; H Young; M F Stiefel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Radioprotection to the eye during CT scanning.

Authors:  K D Hopper; J D Neuman; S H King; A R Kunselman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  A guide to identification and selection of axial planes in magnetic resonance imaging of the brain.

Authors:  Shoichiro Otake; Toshiaki Taoka; Masayuki Maeda; William Tc Yuh
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2018-04-19

8.  Eye-lens bismuth shielding in paediatric head CT: artefact evaluation and reduction.

Authors:  Maria Raissaki; Kostas Perisinakis; John Damilakis; Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-06-16

9.  A new reference line for the brain CT: the tuberculum sellae-occipital protuberance line is parallel to the anterior/posterior commissure line.

Authors:  Y I Kim; K J Ahn; Y A Chung; B S Kim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Lens Dose Reduction by Patient Posture Modification During Neck CT.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Mosher; John A Butman; Les R Folio; Nadia M Biassou; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.